CNN based semantic segmentation for urban traffic scenes using fisheye camera
Abstract
Semantic segmentation is an important step of visual scene understanding for autonomous driving. Recently, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based methods have successfully applied in semantic segmentation using narrow-angle or even wide-angle pinhole camera. However, in urban traffic environments, autonomous vehicles need wider field of view to perceive surrounding things and stuff, especially at intersections. This paper describes a CNN-based semantic segmentation solution using fisheye camera which covers a large field of view. To handle the complex scene in the fisheye image, Overlapping Pyramid Pooling (OPP) module is proposed to explore local, global and pyramid local region context information. Based on the OPP module, a network structure called OPP-net is proposed for semantic segmentation. The net is trained and evaluated on a fisheye image dataset for semantic segmentation which is generated from an existing dataset of urban traffic scenes. In addition, zoom augmentation, a novel data augmentation policy specially designed for fisheye image, is proposed to improve the net's generalization performance. Experiments demonstrate the outstanding performance of the OPP-net for urban traffic scenes and the effectiveness of the zoom augmentation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Careful inspection of training sets for outliers improves the robustness of deep neural networks, especially with regards to adversarial examples.
“However, at the same time, it was shown that careful inspection of the training sets for outliers improves the robustness of deep neural networks [36], especially with regards to the adversarial examples.”
From WoodScape: A Multi-Task, Multi-Camera Fisheye Dataset for Autonomous Driving (2019) · cites this paper as [36]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 111
- Authors
- Deng, L., Yang, M., Qian, Y., Wang, C., & Wang, B.
- Affiliations
- Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-06
- Pages
- 231-236
- ISSN
- 1931-0587 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2741141082
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Keywords
- semantic segmentation, fisheye camera, urban traffic scenes, autonomous driving, intersections, context modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review