Cited by 111Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

CNN based semantic segmentation for urban traffic scenes using fisheye camera

Deng, Liuyuan, Yang, Ming, Qian, Yeqiang, Wang, Chunxiang, Wang, Bing·2017·2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)

Abstract

Semantic segmentation is an important step of visual scene understanding for autonomous driving. Recently, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based methods have successfully applied in semantic segmentation using narrow-angle or even wide-angle pinhole camera. However, in urban traffic environments, autonomous vehicles need wider field of view to perceive surrounding things and stuff, especially at intersections. This paper describes a CNN-based semantic segmentation solution using fisheye camera which covers a large field of view. To handle the complex scene in the fisheye image, Overlapping Pyramid Pooling (OPP) module is proposed to explore local, global and pyramid local region context information. Based on the OPP module, a network structure called OPP-net is proposed for semantic segmentation. The net is trained and evaluated on a fisheye image dataset for semantic segmentation which is generated from an existing dataset of urban traffic scenes. In addition, zoom augmentation, a novel data augmentation policy specially designed for fisheye image, is proposed to improve the net's generalization performance. Experiments demonstrate the outstanding performance of the OPP-net for urban traffic scenes and the effectiveness of the zoom augmentation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ivs.2017.7995725

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Careful inspection of training sets for outliers improves the robustness of deep neural networks, especially with regards to adversarial examples.

    “However, at the same time, it was shown that careful inspection of the training sets for outliers improves the robustness of deep neural networks [36], especially with regards to the adversarial examples.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 111

Authors
Deng, L., Yang, M., Qian, Y., Wang, C., & Wang, B.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Venue
2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-06
Pages
231-236
ISSN
1931-0587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2741141082
Cited by
111
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
semantic segmentation, fisheye camera, urban traffic scenes, autonomous driving, intersections, context modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review