Detecting unexpected obstacles for self-driving cars: Fusing deep learning and geometric modeling
Abstract
The detection of small road hazards, such as lost cargo, is a vital capability for self-driving cars. We tackle this challenging and rarely addressed problem with a vision system that leverages appearance, contextual as well as geometric cues. To utilize the appearance and contextual cues, we propose a new deep learning-based obstacle detection framework. Here a variant of a fully convolutional network is proposed to predict a pixel-wise semantic labeling of (i) free-space, (ii) on-road unexpected obstacles, and (iii) background. The geometric cues are exploited using a state-of-the-art detection approach that predicts obstacles from stereo input images via model-based statistical hypothesis tests. We present a principled Bayesian framework to fuse the semantic and stereo-based detection results. The mid-level Stixel representation is used to describe obstacles in a flexible, compact and robust manner. We evaluate our new obstacle detection system on the Lost and Found dataset, which includes very challenging scenes with obstacles of only 5 cm height. Overall, we report a major improvement over the state-of-the-art, with a performance gain of 27.4%. In particular, we achieve a detection rate of over 90% for distances of up to 50 m. Our system operates at 22 Hz on our self-driving platform.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 170
- Authors
- Ramos, S., Gehrig, S., Pinggera, P., Franke, U., & Rother, C.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- Daimler (Germany) (DE)
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-06
- Pages
- 1025-1032
- ISSN
- 1931-0587 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2567575208
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 22.17
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
- Keywords
- autonomous vehicles, obstacle detection, semantic segmentation, stereo vision, geometric modeling, Bayesian fusion, stixels
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review