A Novel Approach for Detecting Road Based on Two-Stream Fusion Fully Convolutional Network
Abstract
Road detection is one of the most basic tasks of autonomous driving systems. At present, researches on this issue mainly take two kinds of data as input,i.e., LIDAR point clouds and RGB images from cameras. To make best use of the advantages and bypass the disadvantages of these two kinds of data, we propose a novel network, namely two- stream fusion fully convolutional network (TSF-FCN), which can take advantage of both the accurate location information from LIDAR point clouds and rich appearance information from RGB images. One stream of this network is LIDAR stream which aggregates multi-scale contextual information from LIDAR point clouds. The other stream is RGB stream which is used for extracting features from RGB images. To fuse the two streams, the feature maps of RGB stream are converted to a bird-view representation to concatenate with that of LIDAR stream. In this way, the two kinds of data can complement each other for detecting road. To verify the efficacy of our TSF-FCN, experiments are carried on KITTI- ROAD benchmark and competitive performance is achieved compared with state-of-the-art methods.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lv et al. (2018) [130] achieve road segmentation performance on KITTI test set of MaxF 94.48%, AP 93.65%, PRE 94.28%, REC 94.69%, FPR 3.17%, FNR 5.31%.
“Lv et al. , 2018 [130] | 94.48 % | 93.65 % | 94.28 % | 94.69 % | 3.17 % | 5.31 % | - | GPU Titan X |”
From Deep Multi-Modal Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [130]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Feng, D., Haase-Schutz, C., Rosenbaum, L., Hertlein, H., Glaser, C., Timm, F., Wiesbeck, W., & Dietmayer, K. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2020.2972974 · Cited by 1,425 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lv, X., Liu, Z., Xin, J., & Zheng, N.
- Affiliations
- Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 32
- Pages
- 1464-1469
- ISSN
- 1931-0587 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2897020901
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Automated Road and Building Extraction
- Keywords
- road detection, autonomous driving, LiDAR point cloud, RGB images, multi-sensor fusion, fully convolutional network
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review