Cited by 16Face recognition and analysisFace and Expression RecognitionBiometric Identification and Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automatic Attendance Management System based on Deep One-Shot Learning

Menezes, Angelo G., Sa, Joao M. D. da C., Llapa, Eduardo, Estombelo-Montesco, Carlos A.·2020·2020 International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP)

Abstract

Due to the positive relationship between the presence of students in classes and their performance, student attendance assessment is considered essential within the classroom environment, even as a tiring and time-consuming task. We proposed a solution for student attendance control using face recognition with deep one-shot learning and evaluated our approach in different conditions and image capturing devices to confirm that such a pipeline may work in a real-world setting. For better results regarding the high number of false negatives that often occur in uncontrolled environments, we also proposed a face detection stage using HOG and a CNN with Max-Margin Object Detection based features. We achieved accuracy and F1 scores of 97% and 98.4% with an iPhone 7 camera, 91.9% and 94.8% with a Moto G camera, and 51.2% and 61.1% with a WebCam respectively. These experiments reinforce the effectiveness and availability of this approach to the student attendance assessment problem since the recognition pipeline can be either made available for embedded processing with limited computational resources (smartphones), or offered as “Software as a Service” tool.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iwssip48289.2020.9145230

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. li, 2018, Low resolution face recognition in the wild
  2. huang, 0, Labeled faces in the wild: A database forstudying face recognition in unconstrained environments, Workshop on Faces in ‘Real-Life’ Images Detection Alignment and Recognition
  3. 10.1109/ICIP.2014.7025068 · DOI
  4. yi, 2014, Learning face representation from scratch
  5. 10.1109/LSP.2016.2603342 · DOI · Paper page
  6. vezhnevets, 2002, Face and Facial Feature Tracking for Natural Human-Computer Inrterface
  7. 10.1016/j.cviu.2015.03.015 · DOI
  8. zhang, 2010, A Survey of Recent Advances in Face Detection
  9. king, 2015, Max-margin object detection
  10. 10.1016/j.imavis.2018.09.002 · DOI
  11. wang, 2018, Deep face recognition A survey
  12. 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2584107 · DOI
  13. krishnan, 2015, Implementation of automated attendance system using face recognition, International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 6
  14. 10.1109/ICGCIoT.2015.7380478 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594 · DOI · Paper page
  16. kalenichenko, 0, Facenet: A unified embedding for face recognition e clustering, Conf 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 815
  17. king, 2009, Dlib-ml: A machine learning toolkit, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 10, 1755
  18. 10.1109/RoboMech.2015.7359497 · DOI
  19. amos, 2016, Openface: A general-purpose face recognition library with mobile applications, CMU School of Computer Science Technical Report
  20. zhao, 2015, Locking and unlocking a mobile device using facial recognition
  21. 10.5244/C.29.41 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1109/ICMECH.2007.4279977 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/INFOP.2015.7489359 · DOI
  24. 10.2307/1243268 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/978-3-319-44790-2_14 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.166 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/978-981-13-0923-6_29 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/CVPR.2014.220 · DOI · Paper page
  29. arsenovic, 0, Face-time-deep learning based face recognition attendance system, 2017 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY), 53
  30. chauhan, 2018, Smart attendance system using cnn, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 119, 675

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Menezes, A. G., Sa, J. M. D. D. C., Llapa, E., & Estombelo-Montesco, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Sergipe (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR)
Venue
2020 International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-07
Pages
137-142
OpenAlex
W3044740098
Cited by
16
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
student attendance management, face recognition, one-shot learning, face detection, histogram of oriented gradients, smartphone camera, software as a service

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review