Knowledge Learning With Crowdsourcing: A Brief Review and Systematic Perspective
Open accessAbstract
Big data have the characteristics of enormous volume, high velocity, diversity, value-sparsity, and uncertainty, which lead the knowledge learning from them full of challenges. With the emergence of crowdsourcing, versatile information can be obtained on-demand so that the wisdom of crowds is easily involved to facilitate the knowledge learning process. During the past thirteen years, researchers in the AI community made great efforts to remove the obstacles in the field of learning from crowds. This concentrated survey paper comprehensively reviews the technical progress in crowdsourcing learning from a systematic perspective that includes three dimensions of data, models, and learning processes. In addition to reviewing existing important work, the paper places a particular emphasis on providing some promising blueprints on each dimension as well as discussing the lessons learned from our past research work, which will light up the way for new researchers and encourage them to pursue new contributions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aggregation methods have been widely studied in crowdsourcing and ensemble learning.
“Aggregation methods have been widely studied in fields such as crowdsourcing and ensemble learning, where strategies are developed to combine predictions (also referred to as worker predictions) to enhance decision quality during training and inference.”
From SkillAggregation: Reference-free LLM-Dependent Aggregation (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang, 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SkillAggregation: Reference-free LLM-Dependent Aggregation
Sun, G., Kagrecha, A., Manakul, P., Woodland, P., & Gales, M. (2025) · Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.756 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, J.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Jing
- ORCID
- Zhang, Jing
- Venue
- IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 749-762
- ISSN
- 2329-9266 (ISSN-L)
- 2329-9274
- OpenAlex
- W4224995877
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 8.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018AAA0102002)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62076130,91846104)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- crowdsourcing, knowledge learning, big data, wisdom of crowds, data characteristics, learning models, learning process
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review