Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 247 of the 247 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine Learning With Data Assimilation and Uncertainty Quantification for Dynamical Systems: A Review

Open access
Cheng, Sibo, Quilodrán-Casas, César, Ouala, Said, Farchi, Alban, Liu, Che, Tandeo, Pierre, Fablet, Ronan, Lucor, Didier, Iooss, Bertrand, Brajard, Julien, Xiao, Dunhui, Janjic, Tijana, Ding, Weiping, Guo, Yike, Carrassi, Alberto, Bocquet, Marc, Arcucci, Rossella·2023·IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica

Abstract

Data assimilation (DA) and uncertainty quantification (UQ) are extensively used in analysing and reducing error propagation in high-dimensional spatial-temporal dynamics. Typical applications span from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to geoscience and climate systems. Recently, much effort has been given in combining DA, UQ and machine learning (ML) techniques. These research efforts seek to address some critical challenges in high-dimensional dynamical systems, including but not limited to dynamical system identification, reduced order surro-gate modelling, error covariance specification and model error correction. A large number of developed techniques and methodologies exhibit a broad applicability across numerous domains, resulting in the necessity for a comprehensive guide. This paper provides the first overview of state-of-the-art researches in this interdisciplinary field, covering a wide range of applications. This review is aimed at ML scientists who attempt to apply DA and UQ techniques to improve the accuracy and the interpretability of their models, but also at DA and UQ experts who intend to integrate cutting-edge ML approaches to their systems. Therefore, this article has a special focus on how ML methods can overcome the existing limits of DA and UQ, and vice versa. Some exciting perspectives of this rapidly developing research field are also discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jas.2023.123537

Cites

247 of 247 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 247 references

Metadata

Authors
Cheng, S., Quilodrán-Casas, C., Ouala, S., Farchi, A., Liu, C., Tandeo, P., Fablet, R., Lucor, D., Iooss, B., Brajard, J., Xiao, D., Janjic, T., Ding, W., Guo, Y., Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., & Arcucci, R.
Venue
IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica
Published
2023-06
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
1361-1387
ISSN
  • 2329-9266 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-9274
OpenAlex
W4378802379
Cited by
303
References
247
FWCI
30.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine Learning With Data Assimilation and Uncertainty Quantification for Dynamical Systems: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jas.2023.123537
The paper
Cheng, S., Quilodrán-Casas, C., Ouala, S., Farchi, A., Liu, C., Tandeo, P., Fablet, R., Lucor, D., Iooss, B., Brajard, J., Xiao, D., Janjic, T., Ding, W., Guo, Y., Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., & Arcucci, R. (2023). Machine Learning With Data Assimilation and Uncertainty Quantification for Dynamical Systems: A Review. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.1109/jas.2023.123537

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.