Cited by 61Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringWireless Body Area NetworksContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Design and evaluation of an intelligent remote tidal volume variability monitoring system in e-health applications

Fekr, Atena Roshan, Radecka, Katarzyna, Zilic, Zeljko·2015·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

A reliable long-term monitoring and diagnosis of breath disorders at an early stage provides an improvement of medical act, life expectancy, and quality of life while decreasing the costs of treatment and medical services. Therefore, a real-time unobtrusive monitoring of respiration patterns, as well as breath parameters, is a critical need in medical applications. In this paper, we propose an intelligent system for patient home care, capable of measuring respiration rate and tidal volume variability via a wearable sensing technology. The proposed system is designed particularly for the goal of diagnosis and treatment in patients with pathological breathing, e.g., respiratory complications after surgery or sleep disorders. The complete system was comprised of wearable calibrated accelerometer sensor, Bluetooth low energy, and cloud database. The experiments are conducted with eight subjects and the overall error in respiration rate calculation is obtained 0.29%±0.33% considering SPR-BTA spirometer as the reference. We also introduce a method for tidal volume variability estimation while validated using Pearson correlation. Furthermore, since it is essential to detect the critical events resulted from sudden rise or fall in per breath tidal volume of the patients, we provide a technique to automatically find the accurate threshold values based on each individual breath characteristics. Therefore, the system is able to detect the major changes, precisely by more than 98%, and p…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2015.2445783

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fekr, A. R., Radecka, K., & Zilic, Z.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2015-09
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
1532-1548
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W1554242441
Cited by
61
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
tidal volume variability, respiration rate monitoring, wearable sensors, accelerometer, Bluetooth Low Energy, cloud databases, home care, sleep disorders, postoperative pulmonary complications, threshold detection, alarm system, e-health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Informatics, Middle Aged, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Tidal Volume, Telemedicine, Young Adult, Remote Sensing Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review