Exploring the Role of the Internet, Care Quality and Communication in Shaping Mental Health: Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey
Abstract
Determinants of user mental health are diverse, interrelated, and often multifaceted. This study explores how internet use, perceived care quality, patient education, and patient centered communication influence mental health, using structural equation modeling. Findings suggest that increased internet use even for health purposes negatively impacts mental health .On the other hand, education level, patient centered-communication (PC-Com) and perception of care quality impact mental health positively [Formula: see text]. Moreover, we also explored the changes across various demographics. The influence of patient education on PC-Com was only significant for Hispanic respondents . Internet use for health purposes influenced PC-Com negatively for White American respondents (β = -0.047, P=0.015). The study reinstated that the internet use, patient centered communication, patient education, and perceived care quality might influence mental health. The society will increasingly seek health information from online sources, so our study provides recommendations to make online health information sources more user friendly and trustworthy, ultimately to minimize negative impact on mental health.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People often turn to online sources for self-diagnosis and health information, despite potential negative impact on mental health.
“Similarly, as evidenced by our prior study on internet use and mental health, people often turn to online sources for self-diagnosis and health information, despite the potential negative impact on mental health [41].”
From User Intentions to Use ChatGPT for Self-Diagnosis and Health-Related Purposes: Cross-sectional Survey Study (2023) · cites this paper as [41]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Choudhury, A., Asan, O., & Alelyani, T.
- Affiliations
- Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
- Najran University (SA)
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 468-477
- ISSN
- 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2208
- OpenAlex
- W3169980659
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Nursing Research
- National Institutes of Health (R15NR018965)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Keywords
- mental health, internet use, health information seeking, perceived quality of care, patient education, patient-centered communication, online health information, Hispanic patients, racial and ethnic differences, Health Information National Trends Survey
- MeSH terms
- Communication, Humans, Mental Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review