Deep Learning in Surgical Workflow Analysis: A Review of Phase and Step Recognition
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In the last two decades, there has been a growing interest in exploring surgical procedures with statistical models to analyze operations at different semantic levels. This information is necessary for developing context-aware intelligent systems, which can assist the physicians during operations, evaluate procedures afterward or help the management team to effectively utilize the operating room. The objective is to extract reliable patterns from surgical data for the robust estimation of surgical activities performed during operations. The purpose of this article is to review the state-of-the-art deep learning methods that have been published after 2018 for analyzing surgical workflows, with a focus on phase and step recognition. METHODS: Three databases, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, and PubMed were searched, and additional studies are added through a manual search. After the database search, 343 studies were screened and a total of 44 studies are selected for this review. CONCLUSION: The use of temporal information is essential for identifying the next surgical action. Contemporary methods used mainly RNNs, hierarchical CNNs, and Transformers to preserve long-distance temporal relations. The lack of large publicly available datasets for various procedures is a great challenge for the development of new and robust models. As supervised learning strategies are used to show proof-of-concept, self-supervised, semi-supervised, or active learning methods are used to mitigate dependency on annotated data. SIGNIFICANCE: The present study provides a comprehensive review of recent methods in surgical workflow analysis, summarizes commonly used architectures, datasets, and discusses challenges.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 136 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Demir, K. C., Schieber, H., Weise, T., Roth, D., May, M., Maier, A., & Yang, S. H.
- Affiliations
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- TUM Klinikum (DE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
- Published
- 2023-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5405-5417
- ISSN
- 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2208
- OpenAlex
- W4386432008
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 136
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7
- FWCI
- 5.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Commerce (123456)
- Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg
- Medical Valley e.V.
- Siemens Healthineers
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Keywords
- surgical workflow analysis, phase identification, deep learning, temporal modeling, recurrent neural networks, hierarchical convolutional neural network, transformer models, surgical data, operating room management, self-supervised learning, semi-supervised learning, active learning (machine learning)
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Humans, Operating Rooms, Workflow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review