Cited by 90Surgical Simulation and TrainingMachine Learning in HealthcareContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Deep Learning in Surgical Workflow Analysis: A Review of Phase and Step Recognition

Open access
Demir, Kubilay Can, Schieber, Hannah, Weise, Tobias, Roth, Daniel, May, Matthias, Maier, Andreas, Yang, Seung Hee·2023·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In the last two decades, there has been a growing interest in exploring surgical procedures with statistical models to analyze operations at different semantic levels. This information is necessary for developing context-aware intelligent systems, which can assist the physicians during operations, evaluate procedures afterward or help the management team to effectively utilize the operating room. The objective is to extract reliable patterns from surgical data for the robust estimation of surgical activities performed during operations. The purpose of this article is to review the state-of-the-art deep learning methods that have been published after 2018 for analyzing surgical workflows, with a focus on phase and step recognition. METHODS: Three databases, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, and PubMed were searched, and additional studies are added through a manual search. After the database search, 343 studies were screened and a total of 44 studies are selected for this review. CONCLUSION: The use of temporal information is essential for identifying the next surgical action. Contemporary methods used mainly RNNs, hierarchical CNNs, and Transformers to preserve long-distance temporal relations. The lack of large publicly available datasets for various procedures is a great challenge for the development of new and robust models. As supervised learning strategies are used to show proof-of-concept, self-supervised, semi-supervised, or active learning methods are used to mitigate dependency on annotated data. SIGNIFICANCE: The present study provides a comprehensive review of recent methods in surgical workflow analysis, summarizes commonly used architectures, datasets, and discusses challenges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2023.3311628

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 136 · Cited by 90

Authors
Demir, K. C., Schieber, H., Weise, T., Roth, D., May, M., Maier, A., & Yang, S. H.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2023-11
Volume
27
Issue
11
Pages
5405-5417
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W4386432008
Cited by
90
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7
FWCI
5.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Commerce (123456)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg
  • Medical Valley e.V.
  • Siemens Healthineers
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
surgical workflow analysis, phase identification, deep learning, temporal modeling, recurrent neural networks, hierarchical convolutional neural network, transformer models, surgical data, operating room management, self-supervised learning, semi-supervised learning, active learning (machine learning)
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Humans, Operating Rooms, Workflow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review