Multi-Disciplinary Dataset Discovery from Citation-Verified Literature Contexts
Open accessAbstract
Identifying suitable datasets for a research question remains challenging because existing dataset search engines rely heavily on metadata quality and keyword overlap, which often fail to capture the semantic intent of scientific investigation. We introduce a literature-driven framework that discovers datasets from citation contexts in scientific papers, enabling retrieval grounded in actual research use rather than metadata availability. Our approach combines large-scale citation-context extraction, schema-guided dataset recognition with Large Language Models, and provenance-preserving entity resolution. We evaluate the system on eight survey-derived computer science queries and find that it achieves substantially higher recall than Google Dataset Search and DataCite Commons, with normalized recall ranging from an average of 47.47% to a highest value of 81.82%. Beyond recovering gold-standard datasets, the method also surfaces additional datasets not documented in the surveys. Expert assessments across all six top-level Fields of Science indicate that a substantial portion of the additional datasets are considered useful, and some are regarded as novel for the specific topics chosen by the experts. These findings establish citationcontext mining as an effective and generalizable paradigm for dataset discovery, particularly in settings where datasets lack sufficient or reliable metadata. To support reproducibility and future extensions, we release our code, evaluation datasets, and results.11https://github.com/Fireblossom/citation-context-dataset-discovery
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multi-document and multimodal scientific reasoning benchmarks report substantial gaps between current systems and expert performance when evidence must be integrated across papers or modalities.
“Multi-document and multimodal scientific reasoning benchmarks further report substantial gaps between current systems and expert performance when evidence must be integrated across papers or modalities [31][32][33].”
From Diagnosing the limits of large language models for structured scientific evidence extraction (2026) · cites this paper as [33]
The Results and Analysis section compares dataset-discovery systems on recall and other discovery metrics, while the Expert Evaluation Protocol assesses the usefulness of datasets they surface. Searches for multi-document or multimodal scientific reasoning benchmarks and gaps between systems and experts found no passage addressing that claim in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- M. D. Wilkinson et al., "The fair guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship," Scientific Data, vol. 3, no. 1, 2016.
- J. Brase, "Datacite -a global registration agency for research data," SSRN Electronic Journal, 2010.
- D. Brickley, M. Burgess, and N. Noy, "Google dataset search: Building a search engine for datasets in an open web ecosystem," in The World Wide Web Conference, 2019, p. 1365-1375.
- A. Zimmerman, "Not by metadata alone: the use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuse," International Journal on Digital Libraries, vol. 7, no. 1-2, p. 5-16, May 2007.
- Y. Luan, L. He, M. Ostendorf, and H. Hajishirzi, "Multi-task identi- fication of entities, relations, and coreference for scientific knowledge graph construction," in Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Em- pirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018.
- S. Jain, M. van Zuylen, H. Hajishirzi, and I. Beltagy, "Scirex: A chal- lenge dataset for document-level information extraction," in Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020.
- C. L. Borgman, Big Data, Little Data, No Data: Scholarship in the Networked World. The MIT Press, Jan. 2015.
- I. V. Pasquetto, B. M. Randles, and C. L. Borgman, "On the reuse of scientific data," Data Science Journal, vol. 16, p. 8, Mar. 2017.
- X. Chen, S. Jia, and Y. Xiang, "A review: Knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 141, p. 112948, Mar. 2020.
- H. Pan, Q. Zhang, E. Dragut, C. Caragea, and L. J. Latecki, "Dmdd: A large-scale dataset for dataset mentions detection," Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 11, p. 1132-1146, 2023.
- J. Heddes, P. Meerdink, M. Pieters, and M. Marx, "The automatic detection of dataset names in scientific articles," Data, vol. 6, no. 8, p. 84, 2021.
- A. Xu, R. Ding, and L. Wang, "Chatpd: An llm-driven paper-dataset net- working system," in Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2, ser. KDD '25. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2025.
- P. Marini, A. Santos, N. Contaxis, and J. Freire, "Data gatherer: Llm-powered dataset reference extraction from scientific literature," in Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing (SDP 2025). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2025.
- P. Datta, S. Datta, and D. Roy, "Raging against the literature: Llm- powered dataset mention extraction," in Proceedings of the 24th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, ser. JCDL '24. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2025.
- H. Zhao, Z. Luo, C. Feng, A. Zheng, and X. Liu, "A context-based framework for modeling the role and function of on-line resource citations in scientific literature," in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th In- ternational Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP- IJCNLP). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019.
- C. Duan and Z. Tan, "Semantically orthogonal framework for citation classification: Disentangling intent and content," in Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, W.-T. Balke, K. Golub, Y. Manolopoulos, K. Stefanidis, and Z. Zhang, Eds. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2026, pp. 183-206.
- A. Cohan, S. Feldman, I. Beltagy, D. Downey, and D. Weld, "Specter: Document-level representation learning using citation-informed trans- formers," in Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguis- tics, 2020, p. 2270-2282.
- Q. Zhang, Z. Chen, H. Pan, C. Caragea, L. J. Latecki, and E. Dragut, "Scier: An entity and relation extraction dataset for datasets, meth- ods, and tasks in scientific documents," in Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024, p. 13083-13100.
- C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schütze, Introduction to Informa- tion Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
- C. Batini, C. Cappiello, C. Francalanci, and A. Maurino, "Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 41, no. 3, p. 1-52, Jul. 2009.
- P. Christen, Data Matching: Concepts and Techniques for Record Linkage, Entity Resolution, and Duplicate Detection. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
- L. Koesten, E. Simperl, T. Blount, E. Kacprzak, and J. Tennison, "Everything you always wanted to know about a dataset: Studies in data summarisation," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 135, p. 102367, Mar. 2020.
- W. W. Cohen, P. Ravikumar, and S. E. Fienberg, "A comparison of string distance metrics for name-matching tasks," in Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Information Integration on the Web, ser. IIWEB'03. AAAI Press, 2003, p. 73-78.
- A. Sinha, Z. Shen, Y. Song, H. Ma, D. Eide, B.-J. P. Hsu, and K. Wang, "An overview of microsoft academic service (mas) and applications," in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, ser. WWW '15. ACM, May 2015, p. 243-246.
- K. Liang, L. Meng, M. Liu, Y. Liu, W. Tu, S. Wang, S. Zhou, X. Liu, F. Sun, and K. He, "A survey of knowledge graph reasoning on graph types: Static, dynamic, and multi-modal," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 46, no. 12, p. 9456-9478, Dec. 2024.
- J. Jiang, Z. Zuo, G. Wu, K. Jiang, and X. Liu, "A survey on all-in- one image restoration: Taxonomy, evaluation and future trends," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 47, no. 12, p. 11892-11911, Dec. 2025.
- H. Wei, Z. Zhang, S. He, T. Xia, S. Pan, and F. Liu, "Plangenllms: A modern survey of llm planning capabilities," in Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2025, p. 19497-19521.
- S. Ghosh and G. Gallego, "Event-based stereo depth estimation: A sur- vey," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 47, no. 10, p. 9130-9149, Oct. 2025.
- H. H. Shomee, Z. Wang, S. N. Ravi, and S. Medya, "A survey on patent analysis: From nlp to multimodal ai," in Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2025.
- H. Zheng, S. Wang, and L. Huang, "A comprehensive survey on document-level information extraction," in Proceedings of the Workshop on the Future of Event Detection (FuturED). Association for Compu- tational Linguistics, 2024, p. 58-72.
- I. Rabaev and M. Litvak, "Recent advances in text line segmentation and baseline detection in historical document images: a systematic review," International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, May 2025.
- Y. Xu, J. Zhang, A. Salemi, X. Hu, W. Wang, F. Feng, H. Zamani, X. He, and T.-S. Chua, "Personalized generation in large model era: A survey," in Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2025, p. 24607-24649.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnosing the limits of large language models for structured scientific evidence extraction
Tan, Z., D’Souza, J., & Auer, S. (2026) · International Journal on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1007/s00799-026-00449-9
Self-citation
- Authors
- Tan, Z., & Duan, C.
- Affiliations
- Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
- Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
- Venue
- 2025 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2025-12-15
- Pages
- 109-118
- ISSN
- 1552-5996 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7119782796
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 1.18
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Keywords
- dataset discovery, large language models, entity resolution, provenance preservation, scientific publications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review