The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exploiting the topology property of social network for rumor detection
Abstract
Information credibility gradually shown its significant influence on social networks with high propagation ability and low confidence threshold, leading to the crucial work of identifying rumors. In this paper, we address the special characteristics of Weibo, the most popular microblogging service in China like Twitter, and proposed a general framework to assess the credibility of information. Specially, we analyze the specific topology-related properties of user network, and confirm the impact on credibility evaluation. We use features extracted from the microblogs, from the text of the reviews, and from the network structures. To explore the effectiveness of our approach, we conduct the experiment based on an extensive set of data provided by the community of management center in Weibo. Our results reveal that features considered in previous studies achieve a better performance with the consideration of new features we proposed. We believe the work in this paper open new dimensions in analyzing online disinformation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Yang et al. (2015) incorporated network features derived from comment providers, and adding the network feature to traditional features substantially improved results.
“It was shown that when the network feature was added to the traditional features, the results improved substantially.”
From Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media: A Survey (2019) · cites this paper as Yang et al. (2015)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- qazvinian, 2011, Rumor has it: Identifying misinformation in microblogs, EMNLP, 1589c1599
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.016128 · DOI
- kimura, 2009, Efficient estimation of influence functions for sis model on social networks, Proc IJCA, 2046c2051
- zhao, 2012, Sir rumor spreading model in the new media age, Physica A, 392, 995c1003
- ratkiewicz, 0, Mapping the Spread of Astroturf in Microblog Streams, WWW 2011
- 10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990256 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.041908 · DOI
- 10.3115/1118693.1118704 · DOI · Paper page
- pak, 2010, Twitter As a Corpus for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- 10.3115/1220575.1220619 · DOI
- carletta, 1996, Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic, Computational Linguistics, 22, 249c254
- tang, 2013, Annual Report on Development of New Media in China
- 10.1109/SITIS.2013.148 · DOI
- ringel, 2012, Tweeting is believing? Understanding Microblog Credibility Perceptions, Proc CSCW
- 10.1145/1807167.1807306 · DOI
- 10.1145/1964858.1964869 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/11503-000 · DOI
- 10.1145/1963405.1963500 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/220916 · DOI
- bai, 2014, A Study on Sentiment Computing and Classification of Sina Weibo with Word2vec, Big Data (BigData Congress, 358 c 36
- 10.1109/MSP.2012.2232713 · DOI
- wang, 2010, Don't follow me: Spam detection in Twitter, Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT) Proceedings of the
- mohar, 1992, Laplace eigenvalues of graphs A survey Discrete Math, 109, 171c183
- 10.1109/43.159993 · DOI
- 10.1002/cpe.4330060203 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media: A Survey
Zubiaga, A., Aker, A., Bontcheva, K., Liakata, M., & Procter, R. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3161603 · Cited by 862
“Another study that tackles rumours in Sina Weibo is reported by [Yang et al. 2015].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Y., Niu, K., & He, Z.
- Affiliations
- Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- 2015 12th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-07
- Pages
- 41-46
- OpenAlex
- W1526711923
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 13.40
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Keywords
- rumor detection, social network topology, information credibility, Weibo, microblogging, online disinformation, text features, network characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review