Cited by 153Photovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies

Thermal Performance and Reliability Analysis of Single-phase PV Inverters with Reactive Power Injection outside Feed-In Operating Hours

Anurag, Anup, Yang, Yongheng, Blaabjerg, Frede·2015·IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics

Abstract

Reactive power support by photovoltaic (PV) systems is of increasing interest, when compared with the conventional reactive power compensation devices. The PV inverters can exchange reactive power with the utility grid in a decentralized manner even outside feed-in operation, especially at night when there is no solar irradiance. However, reactive power injection causes additional power losses in the switching components leading to a temperature rise in the devices. Thus, this paper analyzes the impact of reactive power injection by PV inverters outside feed-in operation on the thermal performance of their power switching components. A thermal analysis based on the mission profile (i.e., solar irradiance and ambient temperature) has been incorporated, so as to determine the additional temperature rise in the components induced by the operation outside feed-in hours. An analytical lifetime model has been used. The damage produced on the transistors has been quantified using the Palmgren-Miner rule. A reliability analysis has been carried out on a PV inverter with and without the injection of reactive power into the utility grid at night. Economic impacts of injecting reactive power from PV inverters outside feed-in operating hours have been analyzed thereafter. This analysis can be helpful to make a better choice while choosing between conventional reactive power devices or PV inverters for injecting reactive power to the grid.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jestpe.2015.2428432

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anurag, A., Yang, Y., & Blaabjerg, F.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Aalborg University (DK)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics
Published
2015-12
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
870-880
ISSN
  • 2168-6777 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6785
OpenAlex
W1969818481
Cited by
153
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Keywords
photovoltaic inverter, reactive power injection, thermal performance, Miner's rule, inverter reliability, economic analysis, reactive power compensation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review