Cited by 70Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityCryptography and Data Security

AI at the Edge: Blockchain-Empowered Secure Multiparty Learning With Heterogeneous Models

Wang, Qianlong, Guo, Yifan, Wang, Xufei, Ji, Tianxi, Yu, Lixing, Li, Pan·2020·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

Edge computing, an emerging computing paradigm pushing data computing and storing to network edges, enables many applications that require high computing complexity, scalability, and security. In the big data era, one of the most critical applications is multiparty learning or federated learning, which allows different parties to collaborate with each other to obtain better learning models without sharing their own data. However, there are several main concerns about the current multiparty learning systems. First, most existing systems are distributed and need a central server to coordinate the learning process. However, such a central server can easily become a single point of failure and may not be trustworthy. Second, although quite a few schemes have been proposed to study Byzantine attacks, a very common and challenging kind of attack in distributed systems, they generally consider the scenario of learning a global model. However, in fact, all parties in multiparty learning usually have their own local models. The learning methods and security issues, in this case, are not fully explored. In this article, we propose a novel blockchain-empowered decentralized secure multiparty learning system with heterogeneous local models called BEMA. Particularly, we consider two types of Byzantine attacks, and carefully design “off-chain sample mining” and “on-chain mining ” schemes to protect the security of the proposed system. We theoretically prove the system performance bound and resilience under Byzantine attacks. The simulation results show that the proposed system obtains comparable performance with that of conventional distributed systems, and bounded performance in the case of Byzantine attacks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2020.2987843

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 70

Authors
Wang, Q., Guo, Y., Wang, X., Ji, T., Yu, L., & Li, P.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2020-10
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
9600-9610
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W3016682614
Cited by
70
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
federated learning, blockchain, edge computing, Byzantine attacks, decentralized learning, single point of failure, BEMA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review