The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hybrid Deep Learning for Botnet Attack Detection in the Internet-of-Things Networks
Open accessAbstract
Deep learning (DL) is an efficient method for botnet attack detection. However, the volume of network traffic data and memory space required is usually large. It is, therefore, almost impossible to implement the DL method in memory-constrained Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices. In this article, we reduce the feature dimensionality of large-scale IoT network traffic data using the encoding phase of long short-term memory autoencoder (LAE). In order to classify network traffic samples correctly, we analyze the long-term inter-related changes in the low-dimensional feature set produced by LAE using deep bidirectional long short-term memory (BLSTM). Extensive experiments are performed with the BoT-IoT data set to validate the effectiveness of the proposed hybrid DL method. Results show that LAE significantly reduced the memory space required for large-scale network traffic data storage by 91.89%, and it outperformed state-of-the-art feature dimensionality reduction methods by 18.92-27.03%. Despite the significant reduction in feature size, the deep BLSTM model demonstrates robustness against model underfitting and overfitting. It also achieves good generalisation ability in binary and multiclass classification scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Bidirectional recurrent neural networks
Schuster, M., & Paliwal, K. K. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.650093 · Cited by 10,172
ADADELTA: An Adaptive Learning Rate Method
Zeiler, M. D. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1212.5701 · Cited by 5,322
Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization
Sharafaldin, I., Habibi Lashkari, A., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy · doi:10.5220/0006639801080116 · Cited by 5,318 · cited 3×
“The application of the DEFCON-8 data set is limited because of the low number of benign traffic samples [36].”
BackgroundA Comprehensive Survey on Internet of Things (IoT) Toward 5G Wireless Systems
Chettri, L., & Bera, R. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2948888 · Cited by 1,737
Analyzing Adversarial Attacks against Deep Learning for Intrusion Detection in IoT Networks
Ibitoye, O., Shafiq, O., & Matrawy, A. (2019) · 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) · doi:10.1109/globecom38437.2019.9014337 · Cited by 281
Soe, Y. N., Feng, Y., Santosa, P. I., Hartanto, R., & Sakurai, K. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9010144 · Cited by 110
Cited by
Internet of Things: Security and Solutions Survey
Sadhu, P. K., Yanambaka, V. P., & Abdelgawad, A. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22197433 · Cited by 299
DCNNBiLSTM: An Efficient Hybrid Deep Learning-Based Intrusion Detection System
Hnamte, V., & Hussain, J. (2023) · Telematics and Informatics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.teler.2023.100053 · Cited by 259
Deep Learning-Based Intrusion Detection for Distributed Denial of Service Attack in Agriculture 4.0
Ferrag, M. A., Shu, L., Djallel, H., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10111257 · Cited by 253
Bhandari, G., Lyth, A., Shalaginov, A., & Grønli, T.-M. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12020298 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Popoola, S. I., Adebisi, B., Hammoudeh, M., Gui, G., & Gacanin, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- Published
- 2021-03-15
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4944-4956
- ISSN
- 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-2541
- OpenAlex
- W3095531713
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 13.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hybrid Deep Learning for Botnet Attack Detection in the Internet-of-Things Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jiot.2020.3034156
- The paper
- Popoola, S. I., Adebisi, B., Hammoudeh, M., Gui, G., & Gacanin, H. (2021). Hybrid Deep Learning for Botnet Attack Detection in the Internet-of-Things Networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2020.3034156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.