A machine-learning-based data-centric misbehavior detection model for internet of vehicles
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) boosts road safety, efficiency, and infotainment by connecting vehicles to form the Internet of Vehicles (IoV). Specifically to safety, IoV complements autonomous cars beyond sensors' line-of-sight, facilitating vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications in a smart transportation environment. The correctness of data exchanged among vehicles is paramount to ensure vehicles behave as per norms. Traditional misbehavior detection methods hardly defend vehicular security effectively due to rapid dynamics and location privacy. In particular, those node-centric classifiers become ill-fit in IoV. This work proposes a data-centric misbehavior detection model based on supervised machine learning (ML). The work also integrates plausibility checks with ML techniques and instantiates the model with six algorithms to demonstrate their comparative effectiveness. In addition to misbehavior detection, the model classifies attack types to support validating countermeasures. Specifically, the work analyzes the supervised learning algorithms for detecting misbehavior in IoV, compares their performance, and identifies their limitations. VeReMi, a vehicle-to-everything (V2X) position forgery attack built-in simulated road traffic data set, is used to test the effectiveness of the proposed model. The performance metrics include precision-recall (PR) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The results demonstrate the effectiveness and significance of ML to detect misbehavior in IoV. The addition of plausibility checks improves the precision and recall by 5% and 2%, respectively.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A data-centric misbehavior detection system for IoVs combines plausibility tests with traditional supervised ML algorithms to improve detection accuracy.
“Recent work developed a data-centric misbehavior detection system for IoVs. This research is unique in that it combines plausibility tests with traditional supervised ML algorithms to improve detection accuracy.”
From Security and Trust Management in the Internet of Vehicles (IoV): Challenges and Machine Learning Solutions (2024) · cites this paper as [138]
Adding location and movement plausibility checks to six supervised ML algorithms yielded a 5% gain in precision and a 2% gain in recall.
“With the added plausibility checks, the findings reveal a 5% and 2% gain in precision and recall, respectively [138].”
From Security and Trust Management in the Internet of Vehicles (IoV): Challenges and Machine Learning Solutions (2024) · cites this paper as [138]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 183
- Authors
- Sharma, P., & Liu, H.
- Affiliations
- University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
- University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- Published
- 2021-03-15
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4991-4999
- ISSN
- 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-2541
- OpenAlex
- W3094692755
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 7.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Security in Wireless Sensor Networks
- Keywords
- Internet of Vehicles, misbehavior detection, vehicular security, vehicle-to-vehicle communication, attack classification, plausibility checks, supervised learning classifiers, data-centric security, location privacy, VeReMi dataset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review