Cited by 183Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Network Security and Intrusion DetectionSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks

A machine-learning-based data-centric misbehavior detection model for internet of vehicles

Sharma, Prinkle, Liu, Hong·2021·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) boosts road safety, efficiency, and infotainment by connecting vehicles to form the Internet of Vehicles (IoV). Specifically to safety, IoV complements autonomous cars beyond sensors' line-of-sight, facilitating vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications in a smart transportation environment. The correctness of data exchanged among vehicles is paramount to ensure vehicles behave as per norms. Traditional misbehavior detection methods hardly defend vehicular security effectively due to rapid dynamics and location privacy. In particular, those node-centric classifiers become ill-fit in IoV. This work proposes a data-centric misbehavior detection model based on supervised machine learning (ML). The work also integrates plausibility checks with ML techniques and instantiates the model with six algorithms to demonstrate their comparative effectiveness. In addition to misbehavior detection, the model classifies attack types to support validating countermeasures. Specifically, the work analyzes the supervised learning algorithms for detecting misbehavior in IoV, compares their performance, and identifies their limitations. VeReMi, a vehicle-to-everything (V2X) position forgery attack built-in simulated road traffic data set, is used to test the effectiveness of the proposed model. The performance metrics include precision-recall (PR) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The results demonstrate the effectiveness and significance of ML to detect misbehavior in IoV. The addition of plausibility checks improves the precision and recall by 5% and 2%, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2020.3035035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 183

Authors
Sharma, P., & Liu, H.
Affiliations
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2021-03-15
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
4991-4999
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W3094692755
Cited by
183
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 7
FWCI
7.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Security in Wireless Sensor Networks
Keywords
Internet of Vehicles, misbehavior detection, vehicular security, vehicle-to-vehicle communication, attack classification, plausibility checks, supervised learning classifiers, data-centric security, location privacy, VeReMi dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review