Cited by 157Software-Defined Networks and 5GSatellite Communication SystemsIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Cost-Aware Dynamic SFC Mapping and Scheduling in SDN/NFV-Enabled Space–Air–Ground-Integrated Networks for Internet of Vehicles

Li, Junling, Shi, Weisen, Wu, Huaqing, Zhang, Shan, Shen, Xuemin·2022·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

Space–air–ground-integrated networks (SAGINs) are deemed as a promising solution to support multifarious Internet of Vehicles (IoV) services with diversified Quality-of-Service (QoS) requirements in future communication networks. Network function virtualization (NFV) and software-defined networking (SDN) are two complementary and promising technologies to reduce the function provisioning cost and coordinate the heterogeneous physical resources in SAGIN. In this article, we investigate the online dynamic virtual network function (VNF) mapping and scheduling in SAGIN, considering the dynamicity of IoV services. The VNF live migration, VNF reinstantiation, and VNF rescheduling are enabled to increase the service acceptance ratio and service provider’s profits. Considering the heterogeneity of space, air, and ground nodes, we first model the migration cost and additional delay incurred by VNF live migration and reinstantiation. We then formulate the dynamic VNF mapping and scheduling jointly as a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problem with specified cost and delay models. We propose two Tabu search (TS)-based algorithms, i.e., TS-based VNF remapping and rescheduling (TS-MAPSCH) algorithm and TS-based pure VNF rescheduling (TS-PSCH) algorithm, to obtain suboptimal solutions to the MILP problem efficiently. Simulation results show that the proposed solution is very close to the optimum and that the proposed dynamic algorithms outperform existing works with respect to multiple performance metrics, including the service provider’s profit, service acceptance ratio, and QoS satisfaction level.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2021.3058250

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 157

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1109/GLOBECOM38437.2019.9013429 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/JIOT.2017.2690902 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1109/JPROC.2019.2951169 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/COMST.2018.2841996 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1109/JSAC.2018.2864425 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/MWC.2019.1800290 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.comnet.2018.12.017 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/GLOBECOM38437.2019.9013347 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/MCOM.2018.1701008 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/JSAC.2020.2986851 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/COMST.2018.2830648 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/TNSM.2016.2598420 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/COMST.2017.2718178 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/JSAC.2020.2986591 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/INFOCOM.2018.8485943 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/JSAC.2018.2815318 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/PCCC.2015.7410276 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/NETSOFT.2015.7116120 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/SaCoNeT.2014.6867768 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/TCCN.2020.2988908 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/TCOMM.2016.2580150 · DOI
  22. 10.23919/CNSM.2017.8256017 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/LCOMM.2017.2747509 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/ICNP.2016.7784431 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/CloudNet.2017.8071528 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/CLOUD.2017.118 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/ICC.2017.7997166 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/TNET.2017.2668470 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/TNSM.2017.2711610 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/MWC.2018.1800365 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/TCOMM.2020.2966715 · DOI
  32. 10.1109/JSAC.2020.3005469 · DOI
  33. 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3020067 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/TCCN.2019.2905199 · DOI
  35. 10.1109/TVT.2019.2912851 · DOI
  36. Bennett, WF$^{2}\text{Q}$ : Worst-case fair weighted fair queueing, 96, 120
  37. 10.1109/MVT.2018.2809473 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/0-387-28356-0_6 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Li, J., Shi, W., Wu, H., Zhang, S., & Shen, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Beihang University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2022-04-15
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
5824-5838
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W3128146732
Cited by
157
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 18
FWCI
11.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  • Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61801011)
  • Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (L192028)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Satellite Communication Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
space-air-ground integrated networks, Internet of Vehicles, software-defined networking, network function virtualization, service function chaining, tabu search, mixed-integer linear programming, cost-aware resource allocation, service provider profit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review