Cited by 107Emotion and Mood RecognitionIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Emotion Recognition for Cognitive Edge Computing Using Deep Learning

Muhammad, Ghulam, Hossain, M. Shamim·2021·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

The growing use of the Internet of Things (IoT) has increased the volume of data to be processed by manifolds. Edge computing can lessen the load of transmitting a massive volume of data to the cloud. It can also provide reduced latency and real-time experience to the users. This article proposes an emotion recognition system from facial images based on edge computing. A convolutional neural network (CNN) model is proposed to recognize emotion. The model is trained in a cloud during off time and downloaded to an edge server. During the testing, an end device such as a smartphone captures a face image and does some preprocessing, which includes face detection, face cropping, contrast enhancement, and image resizing. The preprocessed image is then sent to the edge server. The edge server runs the CNN model and infers a decision on emotion. The decision is then transmitted back to the smartphone. Two data sets, JAFFE and extended Cohn–Kanade (CK+), are used for the evaluation. Experimental results show that the proposed system is energy efficient, has less learnable parameters, and good recognition accuracy. The accuracies using the JAFFE and CK+ data sets are 93.5% and 96.6%, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2021.3058587

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IoT devices are deployed at the edge of the network with very-low processing capacity and memory footprint.

    “IoT devices are deployed at the edge of the network with very-low processing capacity and memory footprint (Muhammad and Hossain, 2021) (Goudarzi et al., 2021).”

    From A review on TinyML: State-of-the-art and prospects (2022) · cites this paper as Muhammad and Hossain, 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muhammad, G., & Hossain, M. S.
Affiliations
King Saud University (SA)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2021-12-01
Volume
8
Issue
23
Pages
16894-16901
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W3171516435
Cited by
107
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 7
FWCI
18.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, through the Vice Deanship of Scientific Research Chairs: Chair of Pervasive and Mobile Computing
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
emotion recognition, edge computing, face images, convolutional neural networks, Internet of Things, cloud-edge collaboration, face detection, JAFFE database, CK+ dataset, energy efficiency, low-parameter models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review