Cited by 190Network Security and Intrusion DetectionData Stream Mining TechniquesInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

Intrusion Detection in the IoT Under Data and Concept Drifts: Online Deep Learning Approach

Open access
Abdel Wahab, Omar·2022·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Although the existing machine learning-based intrusion detection systems in the Internet of Things (IoT) usually perform well in static environments, they struggle to preserve their performance over time, in dynamic environments. Yet, the IoT is a highly dynamic and heterogeneous environment, leading to what is known as data drift and concept drift. Data drift is a phenomenon which embodies the change that happens in the relationships among the independent features, which is mainly due to changes in the data quality over time. Concept drift is a phenomenon which depicts the change in the relationships between input and output data in the machine learning model over time. To detect data and concept drifts, we first propose a drift detection technique that capitalizes on the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method to study the change in the variance of the features across the intrusion detection data streams. We also discuss an online outlier detection technique that identifies the outliers that diverge both from historical and temporally close data points. To counter these drifts, we discuss an online deep neural network that dynamically adjusts the sizes of the hidden layers based on the Hedge weighting mechanism, thus enabling the model to steadily learn and adapt as new intrusion data come. Experiments conducted on an IoT based intrusion detection dataset suggest that our solution stabilizes the performance of the intrusion detection on both the training and testing data…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2022.3167005

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IoT devices and networks are highly vulnerable to security attacks that target data integrity and service availability.

    “Unfortunately, IoT devices and networks are known to be highly vulnerable to security attacks that target data integrity and service availability.”

    From Deep learning-enabled anomaly detection for IoT systems (2023) · cites this paper as [5]

  • The DS2OS dataset has been used in many state-of-the-art papers such as [5,52].

    “The dataset has been used in many state-of-the-art papers such as [5,52].”

    From Deep learning-enabled anomaly detection for IoT systems (2023) · cites this paper as [5]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdel Wahab, O.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC, Canada
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2022-10-15
Volume
9
Issue
20
Pages
19706-19716
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W4226125749
Cited by
190
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 8
FWCI
15.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2020-04707)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Keywords
intrusion detection, Internet of Things, data drift, concept drift, online learning, drift detection, principal component analysis, outlier detection, data streams

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review