Cited by 12Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetySafety Systems Engineering in AutonomyHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

A Data-driven Control Policy based Driving Safety Analysis System for Autonomous Vehicles

Kang, Liuwang, Shen, Haiying, Li, Yezhuo, Xu, Shiwei·2023·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

An autonomous vehicle (AV) is a combination of subsystems, measuring its driving environments with different sensors (e.g., camera, RADAR, and LiDAR) in real time. AVs follow their control policies and make real-time control decisions based on sensor measurements to ensure driving safety. Control policies in an AV are usually implemented with codes and not open to the public and drivers, which results in people’s strong concerns about driving safety. In this article, we propose a data-driven control policy-based driving safety analysis system (PoSa) to analyze the driving safety of a target AV. In PoSa, we first build a data-driven control policy extraction method to extract control policies of a target AV based on its historical driving data. Then, we develop a hazard driving scenario identification method to identify possible hazard driving scenarios of a target AV by executing the extracted control policies under different driving scenarios. Finally, we use vehicle driving data from one industry-standard AV platform (Baidu Apollo) to evaluate PoSa’s hazard driving scenario identification performance. We compared its identification results with Baidu AV accident reports from California DMV and the hazard driving scenario identification results cover as many as 89% hazard driving scenarios in the Baidu AV accident report, which demonstrates that PoSa has good performance on identifying hazard driving scenarios and its identification results can be used to optimize control po…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2023.3244756

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research analyzing the level of impact on the driving safety of AVs by ODD is still insufficient.

    “However, several studies have been published on the performance of ADS-mounted sensors, but research analyzing the level of impact on the driving safety of AVs by ODD is still insufficient [16][17][18][19].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, L., Shen, H., Li, Y., & Xu, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Clemson University (US)
  • Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2023-08-15
Volume
10
Issue
16
Pages
14058-14070
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W4321021081
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. NSF (NSF-1827674, NSF-1822965)
  • Federal Highway Administration (693JJ31950016)
  • Microsoft Research Faculty Fellowship (8300751)
  • Commonwealth Cyber Initiative (CCI), an Investment in the Advancement of Cyber Research, Innovation and Workforce Development
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (52002309)
  • Natural Science Foundation Project of Shaanxi Province (2020JQ-669)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, driving safety, vehicle driving data, Baidu Apollo, accident reports

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review