Cited by 37Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataCryptography and Data Security

Lightweight Privacy and Security Computing for Blockchained Federated Learning in IoT

Fan, Mochan, Ji, Kailai, Zhang, Zhaofeng, Yu, Hongfang, Sun, Gang·2023·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

The development of Internet of Things (IoT) makes human life more intelligent, and the interconnection of all things has become a reality. However, the surge in the number of devices and centralized management brings severe challenges to IoT, such as single point of failure, poor security, privacy leakage, and low reliability. Due to the decentralization, verifiability, and privacy protection of blockchain federated learning (BFL), some BFL schemes have been proposed to solve these problems, but bring new challenges, such as device privacy leakage and heavy security computing load. In this article, we propose a new decentralized, secure and verifiable consortium BFL privacy protection scheme, named LPBFL, which realizes lightweight computing while ensuring the privacy of the local model and data set of the device. To achieve lightweight privacy protection, LPBFL adopts the Paillier encryption and the newly designed lightweight digital signature and batch verification algorithm. Additionally, considering that devices upload invalid or even toxic local models intentionally or unintentionally, we design a device reputation selection mechanism to make BFL more efficient. Finally, the theoretical analysis proves the security of LPBFL and verifies the unforgeability of the proposed digital signature. Comprehensive comparisons and extensive experiments demonstrate that our LPBFL has significant advantages in multiple aspects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2023.3267112

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FL is a mainstream solution for solving the problems concerning huge communication overheads, data privacy security, and heterogeneous data fusion.

    “It is a mainstream solution for solving the problems concerning huge communication overheads, data privacy security, and heterogeneous data fusion (Fan et al. 2023;Xu et al. 2023).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 37

Authors
Fan, M., Ji, K., Zhang, Z., Yu, H., & Sun, G.
Affiliations
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2023-09-15
Volume
10
Issue
18
Pages
16048-16060
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W4365801534
Cited by
37
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 2
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Open Research Projects of Zhejiang Lab (2022QA0AB02)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2022NSFSC0913)
  • Sichuan Province Selected Funding for Postdoctoral Research Projects (TB2022032)
  • PCL Future Greater-Bay Area Network Facilities for Large-Scale Experiments and Applications (LZC0019)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
Internet of Things security, privacy preservation, Paillier cryptosystem, digital signatures, batch verification, consortium blockchain, lightweight computation, verifiable computation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review