Lightweight Privacy and Security Computing for Blockchained Federated Learning in IoT
Abstract
The development of Internet of Things (IoT) makes human life more intelligent, and the interconnection of all things has become a reality. However, the surge in the number of devices and centralized management brings severe challenges to IoT, such as single point of failure, poor security, privacy leakage, and low reliability. Due to the decentralization, verifiability, and privacy protection of blockchain federated learning (BFL), some BFL schemes have been proposed to solve these problems, but bring new challenges, such as device privacy leakage and heavy security computing load. In this article, we propose a new decentralized, secure and verifiable consortium BFL privacy protection scheme, named LPBFL, which realizes lightweight computing while ensuring the privacy of the local model and data set of the device. To achieve lightweight privacy protection, LPBFL adopts the Paillier encryption and the newly designed lightweight digital signature and batch verification algorithm. Additionally, considering that devices upload invalid or even toxic local models intentionally or unintentionally, we design a device reputation selection mechanism to make BFL more efficient. Finally, the theoretical analysis proves the security of LPBFL and verifies the unforgeability of the proposed digital signature. Comprehensive comparisons and extensive experiments demonstrate that our LPBFL has significant advantages in multiple aspects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FL is a mainstream solution for solving the problems concerning huge communication overheads, data privacy security, and heterogeneous data fusion.
“It is a mainstream solution for solving the problems concerning huge communication overheads, data privacy security, and heterogeneous data fusion (Fan et al. 2023;Xu et al. 2023).”
From Survey: federated learning data security and privacy-preserving in edge-Internet of Things (2024) · cites this paper as Fan et al. 2023
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Fan, M., Ji, K., Zhang, Z., Yu, H., & Sun, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- Published
- 2023-09-15
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 16048-16060
- ISSN
- 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-2541
- OpenAlex
- W4365801534
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Open Research Projects of Zhejiang Lab (2022QA0AB02)
- Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2022NSFSC0913)
- Sichuan Province Selected Funding for Postdoctoral Research Projects (TB2022032)
- PCL Future Greater-Bay Area Network Facilities for Large-Scale Experiments and Applications (LZC0019)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Keywords
- Internet of Things security, privacy preservation, Paillier cryptosystem, digital signatures, batch verification, consortium blockchain, lightweight computation, verifiable computation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review