The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine Learning Techniques in Optical Communication
Abstract
Machine learning techniques relevant for nonlinearity mitigation, carrier recovery, and nanoscale device characterization are reviewed and employed. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in combination with Bayesian filtering is employed within the nonlinear state-space framework and demonstrated for parameter estimation. It is shown that the time-varying effects of cross-phase modulation (XPM) induced polarization scattering and phase noise can be formulated within the nonlinear state-space model (SSM). This allows for tracking and compensation of the XPM induced impairments by employing approximate stochastic filtering methods such as extended Kalman or particle filtering. The achievable gains are dependent on the autocorrelation (AC) function properties of the impairments under consideration which is strongly dependent on the transmissions scenario. The gain of the compensation method are therefore investigated by varying the parameters of the AC function describing XPM-induced polarization scattering and phase noise. It is shown that an increase in the nonlinear tolerance of more than 2 dB is achievable for 32 Gbaud QPSK and 16-quadratic-amplitude modulation (QAM). It is also reviewed how laser rate equations can be formulated within the nonlinear state-space framework which allows for tracking of nonLorentzian laser phase noise lineshapes. It is experimentally demonstrated for 28 Gbaud 16-QAM signals that if the laser phase noise shape strongly deviates from the Lorentzian, phase noise tracking algorithms employing rate equation-based SSM result in a significant performance improvement ($>$8 dB) compared to traditional approaches using digital phase-locked loop. Finally, Gaussian mixture model is reviewed and employed for nonlinear phase noise compensation and characterization of nanoscale devices structure variations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bayesian Filtering and Smoothing
Särkkä, S. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139344203 · Cited by 1,784
Cited by
End-to-End Deep Learning of Optical Fiber Communications
Karanov, B., Chagnon, M., Thouin, F., Eriksson, T. A., Bulow, H., Lavery, D., Bayvel, P., & Schmalen, L. (2018) · Journal of Lightwave Technology · doi:10.1109/jlt.2018.2865109 · Cited by 417
Artificial intelligence (AI) methods in optical networks: A comprehensive survey
Mata, J., de Miguel, I., Durán, R. J., Merayo, N., Singh, S. K., Jukan, A., & Chamania, M. (2018) · Optical Switching and Networking · doi:10.1016/j.osn.2017.12.006 · Cited by 359
A silicon photonic–electronic neural network for fibre nonlinearity compensation
Huang, C., Fujisawa, S., de Lima, T. F., Tait, A. N., Blow, E. C., Tian, Y., Bilodeau, S., Jha, A., Yaman, F., Peng, H.-T., et al. (2021) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-021-00661-2 · Cited by 303
Single chip photonic deep neural network with accelerated training
Bandyopadhyay, S., Sludds, A., Krastanov, S., Hamerly, R., Harris, N., Bunandar, D., Streshinsky, M., Hochberg, M., & Englund, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.01623 · Cited by 265
Cui, N., Zheng, Z., Zhang, X., Yi, W., Guo, R., Zhang, W., Tang, X., Xu, H., & Xi, L. (2019) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.27.011557 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Zibar, D., Piels, M., Jones, R., & Schaeffer, C. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Lightwave Technology
- Published
- 2016-03-15
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1442-1452
- ISSN
- 0733-8724 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2213
- OpenAlex
- W2294103580
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine Learning Techniques in Optical Communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jlt.2015.2508502
- The paper
- Zibar, D., Piels, M., Jones, R., & Schaeffer, C. G. (2016). Machine Learning Techniques in Optical Communication. Journal of Lightwave Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2015.2508502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.