Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

One-Dimensional CNN-Based Intelligent Recognition of Vibrations in Pipeline Monitoring With DAS

Wu, Huijuan, Chen, Jiping, Liu, Xiangrong, Xiao, Yao, Wang, Mengjiao, Zheng, Yi, Rao, Yunjiang·2019·Journal of Lightwave Technology

Abstract

The vibration recognition along the fiber is still a challenging problem in pipeline monitoring with distributed optical-fiber acoustic sensor (DAS), because the burying environments in a wide range are complicated, and there are many different vibration sources interfering at different fiber locations, which are unpredictable and changing from time to time. Conventional machine learning methods with fixed hand-crated feature extraction are always time-consuming and laborious, and the recognition is relying heavily on expert knowledge, which has poor generalization ability. Thus, deep learning algorithms have been tried in this area. However, in this paper, it is found that one-dimensional (1-D) CNN can extract the distinguishable properties of the vibration signals of DAS with better performance and efficiency than the 2-D CNN through real field data experiments. And there are two main increment of the work: First, we try to use an efficient 1-D CNN to replace the 2-D CNN for feature extraction, which can improve the computation efficiency by directly feeding raw or the denoised data without any transformation or other manual work, and using simpler network structure; second, we optimize the classification further by replacing the softmax layer by the support vector machine (SVM) classifier, which is selected optimally from several typical classifiers, such as SVM, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting. Finally, the proposed method (1-D CNN+SVM) can achieve an average recognition accuracy of over 98% for five main classes of typical DAS signals in the oil pipeline monitoring application, which is superior to the conventional machine learning methods with fixed hand-crated feature. At the same time, both accuracy and efficiency of the method are better than those of the 2-D CNN.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jlt.2019.2923839

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Metadata

Authors
Wu, H., Chen, J., Liu, X., Xiao, Y., Wang, M., Zheng, Y., & Rao, Y.
Venue
Journal of Lightwave Technology
Published
2019-09-01
Volume
37
Issue
17
Pages
4359-4366
ISSN
  • 0733-8724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2213
OpenAlex
W2953212672
Cited by
267
References
13
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: One-Dimensional CNN-Based Intelligent Recognition of Vibrations in Pipeline Monitoring With DAS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jlt.2019.2923839
The paper
Wu, H., Chen, J., Liu, X., Xiao, Y., Wang, M., Zheng, Y., & Rao, Y. (2019). One-Dimensional CNN-Based Intelligent Recognition of Vibrations in Pipeline Monitoring With DAS. Journal of Lightwave Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2019.2923839

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.