Cited by 80Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies

Silk-Backed Structural Optimization of High-Density Flexible Intracortical Neural Probes

Wu, Fan, Tien, Lee W., Chen, Fujun, Berke, Joshua D., Kaplan, David L., Yoon, Euisik·2015·Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems

Abstract

Many chronic neuroscience studies require neural probes that can reliably record with a large number of electrodes in a densely configured array. Previous works have shown that adverse tissue reaction can be significantly reduced as probe shanks are scaled down toward subcellular dimensions. In addition, flexible probes can mitigate shear stress-induced tissue damage due to micromotion. However, both size reduction and flexibility compromise probe's ability to penetrate the pia mater, especially when many electrodes are distributed across multiple probe shanks. In this paper, we present a method to lithographically pattern a biodegradable silk coating that provides temporary mechanical stiffness for the surgical insertion of flexible probes without any conventional design constraints on the probe size, shape, or material. After insertion, the silk is completely dissolved in the tissue, only leaving the flexible minimum-geometry probes inside the brain. We validated the design by successfully inserting silk-backed 64-channel parylene probes into the motor cortex of Long-Evans rats (n = 6) and recorded in vivo neural activity for six weeks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jmems.2014.2375326

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, F., Tien, L. W., Chen, F., Berke, J. D., Kaplan, D. L., & Yoon, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Venue
Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems
Published
2015-02
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
62-69
ISSN
  • 1057-7157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0158
OpenAlex
W2326037086
Cited by
80
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency through the Microsystems Technology Office (66001-12-C-4022)
  • National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Keywords
biodegradable materials, high-density electrode arrays, probe insertion, tissue reaction, stiffness, in vivo neural recording

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review