The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Matrix Completion With Noise
Open accessAbstract
On the heels of compressed sensing, a new field has very recently emerged. This field addresses a broad range of problems of significant practical interest, namely, the recovery of a data matrix from what appears to be incomplete, and perhaps even corrupted, information. In its simplest form, the problem is to recover a matrix from a small sample of its entries. It comes up in many areas of science and engineering, including collaborative filtering, machine learning, control, remote sensing, and computer vision, to name a few. This paper surveys the novel literature on matrix completion, which shows that under some suitable conditions, one can recover an unknown low-rank matrix from a nearly minimal set of entries by solving a simple convex optimization problem, namely, nuclear-norm minimization subject to data constraints. Further, this paper introduces novel results showing that matrix completion is provably accurate even when the few observed entries are corrupted with a small amount of noise. A typical result is that one can recover an unknown n x n matrix of low rank r from just about nr log^2 n noisy samples with an error that is proportional to the noise level. We present numerical results that complement our quantitative analysis and show that, in practice, nuclear-norm minimization accurately fills in the many missing entries of large low-rank matrices from just a few noisy samples. Some analogies between matrix completion and compressed sensing are discussed throughout.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Weighted Nuclear Norm Minimization with Application to Image Denoising
Gu, S., Zhang, L., Zuo, W., & Feng, X. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.366 · Cited by 2,316
Matrix Completion Methods for Causal Panel Data Models
Athey, S., Bayati, M., Doudchenko, N., Imbens, G., & Khosravi, K. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w25132 · Cited by 497
Missing Modalities Imputation via Cascaded Residual Autoencoder
Tran, L., Liu, X., Zhou, J., & Jin, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.528 · Cited by 256
Federated Tensor Mining for Secure Industrial Internet of Things
Kong, L., Liu, X.-Y., Sheng, H., Zeng, P., & Chen, G. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2937876 · Cited by 68
Causal models for longitudinal and panel data: a survey
Arkhangelsky, D., & Imbens, G. (2024) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1093/ectj/utae014 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Candes, E. J., & Plan, Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 925-936
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2256
- OpenAlex
- W2047071281
- Cited by
- 1,709
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 88.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Matrix Completion With Noise. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jproc.2009.2035722
- The paper
- Candes, E. J., & Plan, Y. (2010). Matrix Completion With Noise. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2009.2035722
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.