The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Behind the Glass: Driver Challenges and Opportunities for AR Automotive Applications
Abstract
As the automotive industry moves toward the car of the future, technology companies are developing cutting-edge systems, in vehicle and out, that aim to make driving safer, more pleasant, and more convenient. While we are already seeing some successful video-based augmented reality (AR) auxiliary displays (e.g., center-mounted backup aid systems), the application opportunities of optical see-through AR as presented on a drivers' windshield are yet to be fully tapped; nor are the visual perceptual and attention challenges fully understood. As we race to field AR applications in transportation, we should first consider the perceptual and distraction issues that are known in both the AR and transportation communities, with a focus on the unique and intersecting aspects for driving applications. This paper describes the some opportunities and driver challenges associated with AR applications in the automotive domain. We first present a basic research space to assist in these inquiries, which delineates head-mounted from heads-up and center-mounted displays; video from optical see-through displays; and world-fixed from screen-fixed AR graphics. We then address benefits of AR related to primary, secondary, and tertiary driver tasks as well as driver perception and cognition challenges inherent in automotive AR systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances
Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995) · Perception of Space and Motion · doi:10.1016/b978-012240530-3/50005-5 · Cited by 1,029
Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events
Neisser, U., & Becklen, R. (1975) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90019-5 · Cited by 784
The measurement of drivers' mental workload
de Waard, D. (1996) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 618
Driver distraction: A review of the literature
Young, K. L., Regan, M., & Hammer, M. (2003) · Cited by 454
Bridger, R. (2008) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781439894927 · Cited by 420
View management for virtual and augmented reality
Bell, B., Feiner, S., & Höllerer, T. (2001) · Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology · doi:10.1145/502348.502363 · Cited by 324
Bridger, R. S. (1995) · doi:10.4324/9780203426135 · Cited by 271
Driver Distraction in Commercial Vehicle Operations
Olson, R. L., Hanowski, R. J., Hickman, J. S., Bocanegra, J., & Virginia Tech Transportation Institute: Center for Truck and Bus Safety (2010) · ROSA P · doi:10.21949/1502647 · Cited by 261
Kim, S., & Dey, A. K. (2009) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1518701.1518724 · Cited by 244
Jones, J. A., Swan, J. E., Singh, G., Kolstad, E., & Ellis, S. R. (2008) · Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization · doi:10.1145/1394281.1394283 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Gabbard, J. L., Fitch, G. M., & Kim, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 124-136
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2256
- OpenAlex
- W2036087188
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 22.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Behind the Glass: Driver Challenges and Opportunities for AR Automotive Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jproc.2013.2294642
- The paper
- Gabbard, J. L., Fitch, G. M., & Kim, H. (2014). Behind the Glass: Driver Challenges and Opportunities for AR Automotive Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2013.2294642
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
