The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power Systems Resilience Assessment: Hardening and Smart Operational Enhancement Strategies
Open accessAbstract
Power systems have typically been designed to be reliable to expected, low-impact high-frequency outages. In contrast, extreme events, driven for instance by extreme weather and natural disasters, happen with low-probability, but can have a high impact. The need for power systems, possibly the most critical infrastructures in the world, to become resilient to such events is becoming compelling. However, there is still little clarity as to this relatively new concept. On these premises, this paper provides an introduction to the fundamental concepts of power systems resilience and to the use of hardening and smart operational strategies to improve it. More specifically, first the resilience trapezoid is introduced as visual tool to reflect the behavior of a power system during a catastrophic event. Building on this, the key resilience features that a power system should boast are then defined, along with a discussion on different possible hardening and smart, operational resilience enhancement strategies. Further, the so-called ΦΛEΠ resilience assessment framework is presented, which includes a set of resilience metrics capable of modeling and quantifying the resilience performance of a power system subject to catastrophic events. A case study application with a 29-bus test version of the Great Britain transmission network is carried out to investigate the impacts of extreme windstorms. The effects of different hardening and smart resilience enhancement strategies are also explored, thus demonstrating the practicality of the different concepts presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies
(2001) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/37.969131 · Cited by 2,851
Panteli, M., & Mancarella, P. (2015) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2015.06.012 · Cited by 932
Self-citation
Cited by
Routing and Scheduling of Mobile Power Sources for Distribution System Resilience Enhancement
Lei, S., Chen, C., Zhou, H., & Hou, Y. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2018.2889347 · Cited by 455
Energy system resilience – A review
Jasiūnas, J., Lund, P. D., & Mikkola, J. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111476 · Cited by 412
“power lines make them impregnable to wind and surface debris, but is more expensive and lengthy if the line is broken by other causes such as earthquakes [136].”
BackgroundRolling Optimization of Mobile Energy Storage Fleets for Resilient Service Restoration
Yao, S., Wang, P., Liu, X., Zhang, H., & Zhao, T. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2019.2930012 · Cited by 292
Microgrid Digital Twins: Concepts, Applications, and Future Trends
Bazmohammadi, N., Madary, A., Vasquez, J. C., Mohammadi, H. B., Khan, B., Wu, Y., & Guerrero, J. M. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3138990 · Cited by 233
Metrics and quantitative framework for assessing microgrid resilience against windstorms
Amirioun, M. H., Aminifar, F., Lesani, H., & Shahidehpour, M. (2019) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.07.025 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Panteli, M., Trakas, D. N., Mancarella, P., & Hatziargyriou, N. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1202-1213
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2256
- OpenAlex
- W2613791018
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 39.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power Systems Resilience Assessment: Hardening and Smart Operational Enhancement Strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jproc.2017.2691357
- The paper
- Panteli, M., Trakas, D. N., Mancarella, P., & Hatziargyriou, N. D. (2017). Power Systems Resilience Assessment: Hardening and Smart Operational Enhancement Strategies. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2017.2691357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.