The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pump-slowly, fetch-quickly (PSFQ): a reliable transport protocol for sensor networks
Abstract
There is a growing need to support reliable data communications in sensor networks that are capable of supporting new applications, such as, assured delivery of high-priority events to sinks, reliable control and management of sensor networks, and remotely programming/retasking sensor nodes over-the-air. We present the design, implementation, and evaluation of pump slowly, fetch quickly (PSFQ), a simple, scalable, and robust transport protocol that is customizable to meet the needs of emerging reliable data applications in sensor networks. PSFQ represents a simple approach because it makes minimum assumptions about the underlying routing infrastructure, it is scalable and energy- efficient because it supports minimum signaling, thereby reducing the communication cost for data reliability, and importantly, it is robust because it is responsive to a wide range of operational error conditions found in sensor network, allowing for the successful operation of the protocol even under highly error-prone conditions. The key idea that underpins the design of PSFQ is to distribute data from a source node by pacing data at a relatively slow speed ("pump slowly"), but allowing nodes that experience data loss to fetch (i.e., recover) any missing segments from their local immediate neighbors aggressively ("fetch quickly"). We present the design and implementation of PSFQ, and evaluate the protocol using the ns-2 simulator and an experimental wireless sensor testbed based on Berkeley motes and the TinyOS operating system. We show that PSFQ can outperform existing related techniques and is highly responsive to the various error conditions experienced in sensor networks. The source code for PSFQ is freely available for experimentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent and Emerging Topics in Wireless Industrial Communications: A Selection
Willig, A. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2008.923194 · Cited by 656
A Survey of Visual Sensor Networks
Soro, S., & Heinzelman, W. (2009) · Advances in Multimedia · doi:10.1155/2009/640386 · Cited by 445
Reliability in wireless sensor networks: A survey and challenges ahead
Mahmood, M. A., Seah, W. K. G., & Welch, I. (2015) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2014.12.016 · Cited by 342
Krishnamurthy, L., Adler, R., Buonadonna, P., Chhabra, J., Flanigan, M., Kushalnagar, N., Nachman, L., & Yarvis, M. (2005) · Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems · doi:10.1145/1098918.1098926 · Cited by 317
Self-citationHughes, L., Wang, X., & Chen, T. (2012) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s121114730 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Wan, C.-Y., Campbell, A. T., & Krishnamurthy, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 862-872
- ISSN
- 0733-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138961279
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pump-slowly, fetch-quickly (PSFQ): a reliable transport protocol for sensor networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jsac.2005.843554
- The paper
- Wan, C.-Y., Campbell, A. T., & Krishnamurthy, L. (2005). Pump-slowly, fetch-quickly (PSFQ): a reliable transport protocol for sensor networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2005.843554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.