The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spectrum sharing between cellular and mobile ad hoc networks: transmission-capacity trade-off
Abstract
Spectrum sharing between wireless networks improves the efficiency of spectrum usage, and thereby alleviates spectrum scarcity due to growing demands for wireless broadband access. To improve the usual underutilization of the cellular uplink spectrum, this paper addresses spectrum sharing between a cellular uplink and a mobile ad hoc networks. These networks access either all frequency subchannels or their disjoint subsets, called spectrum underlay and spectrum overlay, respectively. Given these spectrum sharing methods, the capacity trade-off between the coexisting networks is analyzed based on the transmission capacity of a network with Poisson distributed transmitters. This metric is defined as the maximum density of transmitters subject to an outage constraint for a given signal-to-interference ratio (SIR). Using tools from stochastic geometry, the transmissioncapacity trade-off between the coexisting networks is analyzed, where both spectrum overlay and underlay as well as successive interference cancelation (SIC) are considered. In particular, for small target outage probability, the transmission capacities of the coexisting networks are proved to satisfy a linear equation, whose coefficients depend on the spectrum sharing method and whether SIC is applied. This linear equation shows that spectrum overlay is more efficient than spectrum underlay. Furthermore, this result also provides insight into the effects of network parameters on transmission capacities, including link diversity gains, transmission distances, and the base station density. In particular, SIC is shown to increase the transmission capacities of both coexisting networks by a linear factor, which depends on the interference-power threshold for qualifying canceled interferers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fundamentals of Wireless Communication
Tse, D., & Viswanath, P. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807213 · Cited by 13,162
NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey
Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, W.-Y., Vuran, M. C., & Mohanty, S. (2006) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2006.05.001 · Cited by 6,356
Cited by
Stochastic geometry and random graphs for the analysis and design of wireless networks
Haenggi, M., Andrews, J. G., Baccelli, F., Dousse, O., & Franceschetti, M. (2009) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2009.090902 · Cited by 1,719
Efficient resource allocation for device-to-device communication underlaying LTE network
Zulhasnine, M., Huang, C., & Srinivasan, A. (2010) · 2010 IEEE 6th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications · doi:10.1109/wimob.2010.5645039 · Cited by 503
On the suitability of Device-to-Device communications for road traffic safety
Khelil, A., & Soldani, D. (2014) · 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT) · doi:10.1109/wf-iot.2014.6803163 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Lau, V. K. N., Chen, Y., & Huang, K.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1256-1267
- ISSN
- 0733-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149165606
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 32.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectrum sharing between cellular and mobile ad hoc networks: transmission-capacity trade-off. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jsac.2009.090921
- The paper
- Lau, V. K. N., Chen, Y., & Huang, K. (2009). Spectrum sharing between cellular and mobile ad hoc networks: transmission-capacity trade-off. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2009.090921
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.