The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Internet Topology Zoo
Abstract
The study of network topology has attracted a great deal of attention in the last decade, but has been hampered by a lack of accurate data. Existing methods for measuring topology have flaws, and arguments about the importance of these have overshadowed the more interesting questions about network structure. The Internet Topology Zoo is a store of network data created from the information that network operators make public. As such it is the most accurate large-scale collection of network topologies available, and includes meta-data that couldn't have been measured. With this data we can answer questions about network structure with more certainty than ever before - we illustrate its power through a preliminary analysis of the PoP-level topology of over 140 networks. We find a wide range of network designs not conforming as a whole to any obvious model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534
Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function Using NetworkX
Hagberg, A. A., Schult, D. A., & Swart, P. J. (2008) · Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference · doi:10.25080/tcwv9851 · Cited by 7,477
Cited by
PINT: Probabilistic In-band Network Telemetry
Ben Basat, R., Ramanathan, S., Li, Y., Antichi, G., Yu, M., & Mitzenmacher, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the Annual conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication on the applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication · doi:10.1145/3387514.3405894 · Cited by 268
Routing for Crowd Management in Smart Cities: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Perspective
Zhao, L., Wang, J., Liu, J., & Kato, N. (2019) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2019.1800603 · Cited by 126
A load-balancing mechanism for distributed SDN control plane using response time
Cui, J., Lu, Q., Zhong, H., Tian, M., & Liu, L. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2018.2876369 · Cited by 130
Topology-aware Federated Learning in Edge Computing: A Comprehensive Survey
Wu, J., Dong, F., Leung, H., Zhu, Z., Zhou, J., & Drew, S. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3659205 · Cited by 130
Network-Wide Configuration Synthesis
El-Hassany, A., Tsankov, P., Vanbever, L., & Vechev, M. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63390-9_14 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Knight, S., Nguyen, H. X., Falkner, N., Bowden, R., & Roughan, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1765-1775
- ISSN
- 0733-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118404561
- Cited by
- 1,739
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 37.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Internet Topology Zoo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jsac.2011.111002
- The paper
- Knight, S., Nguyen, H. X., Falkner, N., Bowden, R., & Roughan, M. (2011). The Internet Topology Zoo. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2011.111002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.