The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Probe and Adapt: Rate Adaptation for HTTP Video Streaming At Scale
Open accessAbstract
Today, the technology for video streaming over the Internet is converging towards a paradigm named HTTP-based adaptive streaming (HAS), which brings two new features. First, by using HTTP/TCP, it leverages network-friendly TCP to achieve both firewall/NAT traversal and bandwidth sharing. Second, by pre-encoding and storing the video in a number of discrete rate levels, it introduces video bitrate adaptivity in a scalable way so that the video encoding is excluded from the closed-loop adaptation. A conventional wisdom in HAS design is that since the TCP throughput observed by a client would indicate the available network bandwidth, it could be used as a reliable reference for video bitrate selection. We argue that this is no longer true when HAS becomes a substantial fraction of the total network traffic. We show that when multiple HAS clients compete at a network bottleneck, the discrete nature of the video bitrates results in difficulty for a client to correctly perceive its fair-share bandwidth. Through analysis and test bed experiments, we demonstrate that this fundamental limitation leads to video bitrate oscillation and other undesirable behaviors that negatively impact the video viewing experience. We therefore argue that it is necessary to design at the application layer using a "probe and adapt" principle for video bitrate adaptation (where "probe" refers to trial increment of the data rate, instead of sending auxiliary piggybacking traffic), which is akin, but also orthogonal to the transport-layer TCP congestion control. We present PANDA - a client-side rate adaptation algorithm for HAS - as a practical embodiment of this principle. Our test bed results show that compared to conventional algorithms, PANDA is able to reduce the instability of video bitrate selection by over 75% without increasing the risk of buffer underrun.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Control-Theoretic Approach for Dynamic Adaptive Video Streaming over HTTP
Yin, X., Jindal, A., Sekar, V., & Sinopoli, B. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication · doi:10.1145/2785956.2787486 · Cited by 1,016
Xie, J., Yu, F. R., Huang, T., Xie, R., Liu, J., Wang, C., & Liu, Y. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2866942 · Cited by 700
NetLLM: adapting large language models for networking
Wu, D., Wang, X., Qiao, Y., Wang, Z., Jiang, J., Cui, S., & Wang, F. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2024 Conference · doi:10.1145/3651890.3672268 · Cited by 167
“For instance, Copa [6] adjusts sending rates for congestion control based on measured queueing delay, while PANDA [53] switches video streaming bitrates based on heuristically estimated bandwidth.”
BackgroundAdaptive Bitrate Selection: A Survey
Sani, Y., Mauthe, A., & Edwards, C. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2725241 · Cited by 121
Recurrent and Dynamic Models for Predicting Streaming Video Quality of Experience
Bampis, C. G., Li, Z., Katsavounidis, I., & Bovik, A. C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2018.2815842 · Cited by 84
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Z., Zhu, X., Gahm, J., Pan, R., Hu, H., Begen, A. C., & Oran, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 719-733
- ISSN
- 0733-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017146017
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 70.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probe and Adapt: Rate Adaptation for HTTP Video Streaming At Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jsac.2014.140405
- The paper
- Li, Z., Zhu, X., Gahm, J., Pan, R., Hu, H., Begen, A. C., & Oran, D. (2014). Probe and Adapt: Rate Adaptation for HTTP Video Streaming At Scale. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2014.140405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.