The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimizing User Association and Spectrum Allocation in HetNets: A Utility Perspective
Open accessAbstract
The joint user association and spectrum allocation problem is studied for multi-tier heterogeneous networks (HetNets) in both downlink and uplink in the interference-limited regime. Users are associated with base-stations (BSs) based on the biased downlink received power. Spectrum is either shared or orthogonally partitioned among the tiers. This paper models the placement of BSs in different tiers as spatial point processes and adopts stochastic geometry to derive the theoretical mean proportionally fair utility of the network based on the coverage rate. By formulating and solving the network utility maximization problem, the optimal user association bias factors and spectrum partition ratios are analytically obtained for the multi-tier network. The resulting analysis reveals that the downlink and uplink user associations do not have to be symmetric. For uplink under spectrum sharing, if all tiers have the same target signal-to-interference ratio (SIR), distance-based user association is shown to be optimal under a variety of path loss and power control settings. For both downlink and uplink, under orthogonal spectrum partition, it is shown that the optimal proportion of spectrum allocated to each tier should match the proportion of users associated with that tier. Simulations validate the analytical results. Under typical system parameters, simulation results suggest that spectrum partition performs better for downlink in terms of utility, while spectrum sharing performs better for uplink with power control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LTE release 12 and beyond [Accepted From Open Call]
Astely, D., Dahlman, E., Fodor, G., Parkvall, S., & Sachs, J. (2013) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2013.6553692 · Cited by 313
Cited by
Applications of Deep Reinforcement Learning in Communications and Networking: A Survey
Luong, N. C., Hoang, D. T., Gong, S., Niyato, D., Wang, P., Liang, Y.-C., & Kim, D. I. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.07862 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, Y., Bao, W., Yu, W., & Liang, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1025-1039
- ISSN
- 0733-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164179872
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimizing User Association and Spectrum Allocation in HetNets: A Utility Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jsac.2015.2417011
- The paper
- Lin, Y., Bao, W., Yu, W., & Liang, B. (2015). Optimizing User Association and Spectrum Allocation in HetNets: A Utility Perspective. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2015.2417011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.