Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Capacity Characterization of UAV-Enabled Two-User Broadcast Channel

Open access
Wu, Qingqing, Xu, Jie, Zhang, Rui·2018·IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have recently gained growing popularity in wireless communications owing to their many advantages such as swift and cost-effective deployment, line-of-sight (LoS) aerial-to-ground link, and controllable mobility in three-dimensional (3D) space. Although prior works have exploited the UAV's mobility to enhance the wireless communication performance under different setups, the fundamental capacity limits of UAV-enabled/aided multiuser communication systems have not yet been characterized. To fill this gap, we consider, in this paper, a UAV-enabled two-user broadcast channel (BC), where a UAV flying at a constant altitude is deployed to send independent information to two users at different fixed locations on the ground. We aim to characterize the capacity region of this new type of BC over a given UAV flight duration, by jointly optimizing the UAV's trajectory and transmit power/rate allocations over time, subject to the UAV's maximum speed and maximum transmit power constraints. First, to draw essential insights, we consider two special cases with asymptotically large/low UAV flight duration/speed, respectively. For the former case, it is shown that a simple hover-fly-hover (HFH) UAV trajectory with time division multiple access (TDMA)-based orthogonal multiuser transmission is capacity-achieving; while in the latter case, the UAV should hover at a fixed location that is nearer to the user with larger achievable rate and in general superposition coding (SC)-based non-orthogonal transmission with interference cancellation at the receiver of the nearer user is required. Next, we consider the general case with finite UAV speed and flight duration. We show that the optimal UAV trajectory should follow a general HFH structure, i.e., the UAV successively hovers at a pair of optimal initial and final locations above the line segment connecting the two users each with a certain amount of time and flies unidirectionally between them at the maximum speed, and SC is generally needed. Furthermore, when TDMA-based transmission is considered for low-complexity implementation, we show that the optimal UAV trajectory still follows an HFH structure, but the hovering locations can only be those above the two users. Extensive simulation results are provided to verify our analysis, which also reveal useful guidelines to the practical design of UAV trajectory and communication jointly.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jsac.2018.2864421

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 209

Metadata

Authors
Wu, Q., Xu, J., & Zhang, R.
Venue
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Published
2018-09
Volume
36
Issue
9
Pages
1955-1971
ISSN
  • 0733-8716 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0008
OpenAlex
W2783189583
Cited by
209
References
2
FWCI
28.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Capacity Characterization of UAV-Enabled Two-User Broadcast Channel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jsac.2018.2864421
The paper
Wu, Q., Xu, J., & Zhang, R. (2018). Capacity Characterization of UAV-Enabled Two-User Broadcast Channel. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2018.2864421

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.