Technologies for Printing Sensors and Electronics Over Large Flexible Substrates: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Printing sensors and electronics over flexible substrates are an area of significant interest due to low-cost fabrication and possibility of obtaining multifunctional electronics over large areas. Over the years, a number of printing technologies have been developed to pattern a wide range of electronic materials on diverse substrates. As further expansion of printed technologies is expected in future for sensors and electronics, it is opportune to review the common features, the complementarities, and the challenges associated with various printing technologies. This paper presents a comprehensive review of various printing technologies, commonly used substrates and electronic materials. Various solution/dry printing and contact/noncontact printing technologies have been assessed on the basis of technological, materials, and process-related developments in the field. Critical challenges in various printing techniques and potential research directions have been highlighted. Possibilities of merging various printing methodologies have been explored to extend the lab developed standalone systems to high-speed roll-to-roll production lines for system level integration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Roll-to-roll rotary screen printing is a promising method for high-throughput and cost-effective fabrication of flexible electronics.
“Roll-to-roll (R2R) rotary screen printing is a promising method for high-throughput and cost-effective fabrication of flexible electronics (37, 38).”
From Regional and correlative sweat analysis using high-throughput microfluidic sensing patches toward decoding sweat (2019) · cites this paper as [37]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 166 · Cited by 1,225
- Authors
- Khan, S., Lorenzelli, L., & Dahiya, R. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Trento (IT)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Venue
- IEEE Sensors Journal
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3164-3185
- ISSN
- 1530-437X (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1748
- OpenAlex
- W2044479329
- Cited by
- 1,225
- References
- 166
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 169 · 2020: 147 · 2019: 151 · 2018: 134 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 32.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Sensors Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through the Fellowship for Growth-Printable Tactile Skin (EP/M002527/1)
- European Commission (PITN-GA-2012-317488-CONTEST)
- EPSRC-Flexible Electronic Device Modelling (EP/M002519/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
- Keywords
- printed electronics, printed sensors, flexible substrates, roll-to-roll printing, contact printing, electronic materials, large-area electronics, system integration, low-cost fabrication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review