Cited by 94Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlECG Monitoring and Analysis

Combining Nonlinear Adaptive Filtering and Signal Decomposition for Motion Artifact Removal in Wearable Photoplethysmography

Ye, Yalan, Cheng, Yunfei, He, Wenwen, Hou, Mengshu, Zhang, Zhilin·2016·IEEE Sensors Journal

Abstract

Heart rate (HR) estimation using photoplethysmography (PPG) has drawn increasing attention in the field of wearable technology due to its advantages with higher degree of usability and lower cost than Electrocardiograph. It has been widely used in wearable devices, such as smart-watches for fitness tracking and vital sign monitoring. However, motion artifact is a strong interference, preventing accurate estimation of HR. Signal decomposition and adaptive filtering are two popular approaches for motion artifact removal, but each of them has inherent drawbacks. In this paper, a hybrid motion artifact removal method is proposed, which combines nonlinear adaptive filtering and signal decomposition, getting the best of both approaches. The method was evaluated on the PPG database used in the 2015 IEEE Signal Processing Cup. The experimental results showed that the method achieved the average absolute error of 1.16 beat per minutes (BPM) on the 12 training data sets, and 2.98 BPM on the ten testing data sets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jsen.2016.2597265

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Motion artifacts can be removed from a single PPG signal using techniques such as a periodic moving average filter, waveform synthesis through stochastic modeling, adaptive filtering, and signal decomposition.

    “Motion artifacts can be removed from a single PPG signal using techniques, such as a periodic moving average filter [78], waveform synthesis through stochastic modeling [79], adaptive filtering, and signal decomposition [80].”

    From Wearable Photoplethysmography for Cardiovascular Monitoring (2022) · cites this paper as [80]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 94

Authors
Ye, Y., Cheng, Y., He, W., Hou, M., & Zhang, Z.
Affiliations
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
Venue
IEEE Sensors Journal
Published
2016-10
Volume
16
Issue
19
Pages
7133-7141
ISSN
  • 1530-437X (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-1748
  • 2379-9153
OpenAlex
W2491650592
Cited by
94
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Sensors Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61501096, 61472067)
  • Chengdu Research Institute of UESTC (RWS-CYHKF-02-20150005)
  • International Science and Technology Cooperation and Exchange Program of Sichuan Province, China (2016HH0020)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
motion artifact removal, photoplethysmography, heart rate estimation, nonlinear adaptive filtering, signal decomposition, wearable sensors, hybrid signal processing, PPG signal quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review