Combining Nonlinear Adaptive Filtering and Signal Decomposition for Motion Artifact Removal in Wearable Photoplethysmography
Abstract
Heart rate (HR) estimation using photoplethysmography (PPG) has drawn increasing attention in the field of wearable technology due to its advantages with higher degree of usability and lower cost than Electrocardiograph. It has been widely used in wearable devices, such as smart-watches for fitness tracking and vital sign monitoring. However, motion artifact is a strong interference, preventing accurate estimation of HR. Signal decomposition and adaptive filtering are two popular approaches for motion artifact removal, but each of them has inherent drawbacks. In this paper, a hybrid motion artifact removal method is proposed, which combines nonlinear adaptive filtering and signal decomposition, getting the best of both approaches. The method was evaluated on the PPG database used in the 2015 IEEE Signal Processing Cup. The experimental results showed that the method achieved the average absolute error of 1.16 beat per minutes (BPM) on the 12 training data sets, and 2.98 BPM on the ten testing data sets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Motion artifacts can be removed from a single PPG signal using techniques such as a periodic moving average filter, waveform synthesis through stochastic modeling, adaptive filtering, and signal decomposition.
“Motion artifacts can be removed from a single PPG signal using techniques, such as a periodic moving average filter [78], waveform synthesis through stochastic modeling [79], adaptive filtering, and signal decomposition [80].”
From Wearable Photoplethysmography for Cardiovascular Monitoring (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Ye, Y., Cheng, Y., He, W., Hou, M., & Zhang, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Sensors Journal
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7133-7141
- ISSN
- 1530-437X (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1748
- 2379-9153
- OpenAlex
- W2491650592
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Sensors Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61501096, 61472067)
- Chengdu Research Institute of UESTC (RWS-CYHKF-02-20150005)
- International Science and Technology Cooperation and Exchange Program of Sichuan Province, China (2016HH0020)
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
- Keywords
- motion artifact removal, photoplethysmography, heart rate estimation, nonlinear adaptive filtering, signal decomposition, wearable sensors, hybrid signal processing, PPG signal quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review