The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep-Learning-Based Earth Fault Detection Using Continuous Wavelet Transform and Convolutional Neural Network in Resonant Grounding Distribution Systems
Abstract
Feature extraction for fault signals is critical and difficult in all kinds of fault detection schemes. A novel simple and effective method of faulty feeder detection in resonant grounding distribution systems based on the continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and convolutional neural network (CNN) is presented in this paper. The time-frequency gray scale images are acquired by applying the CWT to the collected transient zero-sequence current signals of the faulty feeder and sound feeders. The features of the gray scale image will be extracted adaptively by the CNN, which is trained by a large number of gray scale images under various kinds of fault conditions and factors. The features extraction and the faulty feeder detection can be implemented by the trained CNN simultaneously. As a comparison, two faulty feeder detection methods based on artificial feature extraction and traditional machine learning are introduced. A practical resonant grounding distribution system is simulated in power systems computer aided design/electromagnetic transients including DC, the effectiveness and performance of the proposed faulty feeder detection method is compared and verified under different fault circumstances.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The references emphasize practical applications ranging from fault diagnosis in power distribution lines to islanding and grid fault detection, indicating a concern for real-world applicability.
“The references emphasize practical applications ranging from fault diagnosis in power distribution lines to islanding and grid fault detection, indicating a concern for real-world applicability [29].”
From Fault Detection and Fault Diagnosis in Power System Using AI: A Review (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2016.00038 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2053562 · DOI
- 10.1109/APPEEC.2016.7779931 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2068578 · DOI
- 10.1109/LSP.2016.2571727 · DOI
- kang, 2016, A deep convolutional neural network using directional wavelets for low-dose X-ray CT reconstruction, Comput Vis Pattern Recognit, 44, 360e
- guo, 2017, Features-clustering-based earth fault detection using singular-value decomposition and fuzzy C-means in resonant grounding distribution systems, Int J Elect Power Energy Syst, 93, 97, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.05.014 · DOI
- zhang, 2013, An ANFIS-based fault classification approach in power distribution system, Int J Elect Power Energy Syst, 49, 243, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.12.005 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2016.2601075 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2004.837836 · DOI
- 10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0140 · DOI
- 10.1049/iet-gtd:20070523 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsr.2010.12.016 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2015.2408814 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICIA.2006.305965 · DOI
- tiantian, 2009, Large scale classification with local diversity AdaBoost SVM algorithm, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 20, 1344
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2014.2361207 · DOI
- 10.1109/TEC.2013.2281491 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0235 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2012.2211898 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2011.2141157 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2005.852367 · DOI
- 10.1109/CCECE.2005.1557253 · DOI
- ngui, 2013, Wavelet analysis: Mother wavelet selection methods, Appl Mech Mater, 393, 953, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.393.953 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2612821 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2657778 · DOI
- nielsen, 2015, Neural Networks and Deep Learning
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shi, Z., Yao, W., Li, Z., Zeng, L., Zhao, Y., Zhang, R., Tang, Y., & Wen, J. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115733 · Cited by 327
Application of Ai Techniques in Monitoring and Operation of Power Systems
Gao, D. W., Wang, Q., Zhang, F., Yang, X., Huang, Z., Ma, S., Li, Q., Gong, X., & Wang, F.-Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Energy · doi:10.1007/s11708-018-0589-4 · Cited by 28
Fault Detection and Fault Diagnosis in Power System Using AI: A Review
Nasim, S. F., Aziz, S., Qaiser, A., Kulsoom, U., & Ahmed, S. (2024) · Sir Syed University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology · doi:10.33317/ssurj.598 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, M.-F., Zeng, X.-D., Chen, D.-Y., & Yang, N.-C.
- Affiliations
- Fuzhou University (CN)
- Yuan Ze University (TW)
- Venue
- IEEE Sensors Journal
- Published
- 2018-02-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1291-1300
- ISSN
- 1530-437X (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1748
- 2379-9153
- OpenAlex
- W2768866948
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Sensors Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China through the Project of Research of Flexible and Adaptive Arc-suppression Method for Single-Phase Grounding Fault in Distribution Networks (51677030)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Power Systems Fault Detection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical Fault Detection and Protection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Quality and Harmonics
- Keywords
- ground fault detection, continuous wavelet transform, convolutional neural networks, zero-sequence current, feature extraction, power system protection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review