Cited by 313Power Systems Fault DetectionElectrical Fault Detection and ProtectionPower Quality and Harmonics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep-Learning-Based Earth Fault Detection Using Continuous Wavelet Transform and Convolutional Neural Network in Resonant Grounding Distribution Systems

Guo, Mou-Fa, Zeng, Xiao-Dan, Chen, Duan-Yu, Yang, Nien-Che·2018·IEEE Sensors Journal

Abstract

Feature extraction for fault signals is critical and difficult in all kinds of fault detection schemes. A novel simple and effective method of faulty feeder detection in resonant grounding distribution systems based on the continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and convolutional neural network (CNN) is presented in this paper. The time-frequency gray scale images are acquired by applying the CWT to the collected transient zero-sequence current signals of the faulty feeder and sound feeders. The features of the gray scale image will be extracted adaptively by the CNN, which is trained by a large number of gray scale images under various kinds of fault conditions and factors. The features extraction and the faulty feeder detection can be implemented by the trained CNN simultaneously. As a comparison, two faulty feeder detection methods based on artificial feature extraction and traditional machine learning are introduced. A practical resonant grounding distribution system is simulated in power systems computer aided design/electromagnetic transients including DC, the effectiveness and performance of the proposed faulty feeder detection method is compared and verified under different fault circumstances.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jsen.2017.2776238

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The references emphasize practical applications ranging from fault diagnosis in power distribution lines to islanding and grid fault detection, indicating a concern for real-world applicability.

    “The references emphasize practical applications ranging from fault diagnosis in power distribution lines to islanding and grid fault detection, indicating a concern for real-world applicability [29].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2016.00038 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2053562 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/APPEEC.2016.7779931 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2068578 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/LSP.2016.2571727 · DOI
  6. kang, 2016, A deep convolutional neural network using directional wavelets for low-dose X-ray CT reconstruction, Comput Vis Pattern Recognit, 44, 360e
  7. guo, 2017, Features-clustering-based earth fault detection using singular-value decomposition and fuzzy C-means in resonant grounding distribution systems, Int J Elect Power Energy Syst, 93, 97, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.05.014 · DOI
  8. zhang, 2013, An ANFIS-based fault classification approach in power distribution system, Int J Elect Power Energy Syst, 49, 243, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.12.005 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/TPWRD.2016.2601075 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/TPWRD.2004.837836 · DOI
  11. 10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0140 · DOI
  12. 10.1049/iet-gtd:20070523 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.epsr.2010.12.016 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/TPWRD.2015.2408814 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/ICIA.2006.305965 · DOI
  16. tiantian, 2009, Large scale classification with local diversity AdaBoost SVM algorithm, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 20, 1344
  17. 10.1109/TPWRD.2014.2361207 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/TEC.2013.2281491 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.10.010 · DOI
  20. 10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0235 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/TPWRD.2012.2211898 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/TPWRD.2011.2141157 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/TPWRD.2005.852367 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/CCECE.2005.1557253 · DOI
  25. ngui, 2013, Wavelet analysis: Mother wavelet selection methods, Appl Mech Mater, 393, 953, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.393.953 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2612821 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2657778 · DOI
  28. nielsen, 2015, Neural Networks and Deep Learning

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Guo, M.-F., Zeng, X.-D., Chen, D.-Y., & Yang, N.-C.
Affiliations
  • Fuzhou University (CN)
  • Yuan Ze University (TW)
Venue
IEEE Sensors Journal
Published
2018-02-01
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
1291-1300
ISSN
  • 1530-437X (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-1748
  • 2379-9153
OpenAlex
W2768866948
Cited by
313
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 7
FWCI
11.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Sensors Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China through the Project of Research of Flexible and Adaptive Arc-suppression Method for Single-Phase Grounding Fault in Distribution Networks (51677030)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Power Systems Fault Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical Fault Detection and Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Quality and Harmonics
Keywords
ground fault detection, continuous wavelet transform, convolutional neural networks, zero-sequence current, feature extraction, power system protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review