HABNet: Machine Learning, Remote Sensing-Based Detection of Harmful Algal Blooms
Open accessAbstract
This article describes the application of machine learning techniques to develop state-of-the-art detection and prediction system for spatiotemporal events found within remote sensing data; specifically, harmful algal bloom (HAB) events. We propose HAB detection system based on a ground truth historical record of HAB events, a novel spatiotemporal datacube representation of each event (from MODIS and GEBCO bathymetry data), and a variety of machine learning architectures utilizing the state-of-the-art spatial and temporal analysis methods based on convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory components together with random forest, and support vector machine classification methods. This work has focused specifically on the case study of the detection of Karenia brevis algae (K. brevis) HAB events within the coastal waters of Florida (over 2850 events from 2003 to 2018; an order of magnitude larger than any previous machine learning detection study into HAB events). The development of multimodal spatiotemporal datacube data structures and associated novel machine learning methods give a unique architecture for the automatic detection of environmental events. Specifically, when applied to the detection of HAB events, it gives a maximum detection accuracy of 91% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.81 for the Florida data considered. A HAB forecast system was also developed where a temporal subset of each datacube was used to predict the presence of a HAB in the future. This system was not significantly less accurate than the detection system being able to predict with 86% accuracy up to 8 d in the future.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Network and connectivity limitations apply to the practice of acquiring data in real-time systems such as algal cultivation for biomass production, low transmission rates to cloud servers, limited transmission reliability, and network capacity to boost data volume.
“This applies to the practice of acquiring data in real-time systems [51] such as ACB, low transmission rates to cloud servers [49], limited transmission reliability [52], and network capacity to boost data volume.”
From Reinvigorating algal cultivation for biomass production with digital twin technology - a smart sustainable infrastructure (2024) · cites this paper as [51]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 143
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- P. Sermanet, D. Eigen, X. Zhang, M. Mathieu, R. Fergus, and Y. LeCun, "Overfeat: Integrated recognition, localization and detection using convo- lutional networks," 2013, arXiv:1312.6229. · arXiv
- I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2016.
- J. P. Cannizzaro, K. L. Carder, F. R. Chen, C. A. Heil, and G. A. Vargo, "A novel technique for detection of the toxic dinoflagellate, Karenia brevis, in the Gulf of Mexico from remotely sensed ocean color data," Continental Shelf Res., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 137-158, 2008.
- S. Rao and F. Al-Yamani, "Phytoplankton ecology in the waters between Shatt Al-Arab and straits of Hormuz, Arabian gulf: A review," Plankton Biol. Ecology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 101-116, 1998.
- A. Berktay, "Environmental approach and influence of red tide to desali- nation process in the middle east region," Int. J. Chem. Environ. Eng., vol. 2, no. 3, 2011.
- Authors
- Hill, P. R., Kumar, A., Temimi, M., & Bull, D. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 3229-3239
- ISSN
- 1939-1404 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-1535
- OpenAlex
- W3035251314
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 8.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- British Council (279334808)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Marine Toxins and Detection Methods
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
- Keywords
- harmful algal blooms, Karenia brevis, HAB forecasting, MODIS, bathymetry, convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory, random forest, support vector machine, Florida coastal waters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review