Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 438

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 298 of the 298 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hyperspectral Image Classification—Traditional to Deep Models: A Survey for Future Prospects

Open access
Ahmad, Muhammad, Shabbir, Sidrah, Roy, Swalpa Kumar, Hong, Danfeng, Wu, Xin, Yao, Jing, Khan, Adil Mehmood, Mazzara, Manuel, Distefano, Salvatore, Chanussot, Jocelyn·2022·IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) has been extensively utilized in many real-life applications because it benefits from the detailed spectral information contained in each pixel. Notably, the complex characteristics, i.e., the nonlinear relation among the captured spectral information and the corresponding object of HSI data, make accurate classification challenging for traditional methods. In the last few years, deep learning (DL) has been substantiated as a powerful feature extractor that effectively addresses the nonlinear problems that appeared in a number of computer vision tasks. This prompts the deployment of DL for HSI classification (HSIC) which revealed good performance. This survey enlists a systematic overview of DL for HSIC and compared state-of-the-art strategies of the said topic. Primarily, we will encapsulate the main challenges of TML for HSIC and then we will acquaint the superiority of DL to address these problems. This article breaks down the state-of-the-art DL frameworks into spectral-features, spatial-features, and together spatial–spectral features to systematically analyze the achievements (future research directions as well) of these frameworks for HSIC. Moreover, we will consider the fact that DL requires a large number of labeled training examples whereas acquiring such a number for HSIC is challenging in terms of time and cost. Therefore, this survey discusses some strategies to improve the generalization performance of DL strategies which can provide some future guidelines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jstars.2021.3133021

Cites

298 of 298 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 298 references

Cited by

See all 438

Metadata

Authors
Ahmad, M., Shabbir, S., Roy, S. K., Hong, D., Wu, X., Yao, J., Khan, A. M., Mazzara, M., Distefano, S., & Chanussot, J.
Venue
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Published
2022
Volume
15
Pages
968-999
ISSN
  • 1939-1404 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-1535
OpenAlex
W3122028341
Cited by
438
References
298
FWCI
28.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperspectral Image Classification—Traditional to Deep Models: A Survey for Future Prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jstars.2021.3133021
The paper
Ahmad, M., Shabbir, S., Roy, S. K., Hong, D., Wu, X., Yao, J., Khan, A. M., Mazzara, M., Distefano, S., & Chanussot, J. (2022). Hyperspectral Image Classification—Traditional to Deep Models: A Survey for Future Prospects. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2021.3133021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.