The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gradient Projection for Sparse Reconstruction: Application to Compressed Sensing and Other Inverse Problems
Abstract
Many problems in signal processing and statistical inference involve finding sparse solutions to under-determined, or ill-conditioned, linear systems of equations. A standard approach consists in minimizing an objective function which includes a quadratic (squared ) error term combined with a sparseness-inducing regularization term. Basis pursuit, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), wavelet-based deconvolution, and compressed sensing are a few well-known examples of this approach. This paper proposes gradient projection (GP) algorithms for the bound-constrained quadratic programming (BCQP) formulation of these problems. We test variants of this approach that select the line search parameters in different ways, including techniques based on the Barzilai-Borwein method. Computational experiments show that these GP approaches perform well in a wide range of applications, often being significantly faster (in terms of computation time) than competing methods. Although the performance of GP methods tends to degrade as the regularization term is de-emphasized, we show how they can be embedded in a continuation scheme to recover their efficient practical performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging
Lustig, M., Donoho, D., & Pauly, J. M. (2007) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21391 · Cited by 6,952
An algorithm for quadratic programming
Frank, M., & Wolfe, P. (1956) · Naval Research Logistics Quarterly · doi:10.1002/nav.3800030109 · Cited by 3,030
Cited by
Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., & Eckstein, J. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000016 · Cited by 17,075
A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems
Beck, A., & Teboulle, M. (2009) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/080716542 · Cited by 11,952
Challenges of Big Data analysis
Fan, J., Han, F., & Liu, H. (2014) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwt032 · Cited by 1,482
Fast Image Recovery Using Variable Splitting and Constrained Optimization
Afonso, M. V., Bioucas-Dias, J. M., & Figueiredo, M. A. T. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2010.2047910 · Cited by 1,223
Self-citationBeyond Nyquist: Efficient Sampling of Sparse Bandlimited Signals
Tropp, J. A., Laska, J. N., Duarte, M. F., Romberg, J. K., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2009.2034811 · Cited by 1,089
Metadata
- Authors
- Figueiredo, M. A. T., Nowak, R. D., & Wright, S. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 586-597
- ISSN
- 1932-4553 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0484
- OpenAlex
- W2109449402
- Cited by
- 3,524
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 156.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gradient Projection for Sparse Reconstruction: Application to Compressed Sensing and Other Inverse Problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jstsp.2007.910281
- The paper
- Figueiredo, M. A. T., Nowak, R. D., & Wright, S. J. (2007). Gradient Projection for Sparse Reconstruction: Application to Compressed Sensing and Other Inverse Problems. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstsp.2007.910281
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.