Context-Aware Activity Recognition and Anomaly Detection in Video
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a mathematical framework to jointly model related activities with both motion and context information for activity recognition and anomaly detection. This is motivated from observations that activities related in space and time rarely occur independently and can serve as context for each other. The spatial and temporal distribution of different activities provides useful cues for the understanding of these activities. We denote the activities occurring with high frequencies in the database as normal activities. Given training data which contains labeled normal activities, our model aims to automatically capture frequent motion and context patterns for each activity class, as well as each pair of classes, from sets of predefined patterns during the learning process. Then, the learned model is used to generate globally optimum labels for activities in the testing videos. We show how to learn the model parameters via an unconstrained convex optimization problem and how to predict the correct labels for a testing instance consisting of multiple activities. The learned model and generated labels are used to detect anomalies whose motion and context patterns deviate from the learned patterns. We show promising results on the VIRAT Ground Dataset that demonstrates the benefit of joint modeling and recognition of activities in a wide-area scene and the effectiveness of the proposed method in anomaly detection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most subspace anomaly detection methods were originally designed to tackle the curse of dimensionality when detecting anomalies in high-dimensional data.
“Moreover, most subspace anomaly detection methods were originally designed to tackle the issue of curse of dimensionality when detecting anomalies in high-dimensional data [231].”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [231]
Cites
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584 · see citing works
The role of context in object recognition
Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.009 · Cited by 1,063 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A comprehensive review on deep learning-based methods for video anomaly detection
Nayak, R., Pati, U. C., & Das, S. K. (2021) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2020.104078 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection
Li, Z., Zhu, Y., & Van Leeuwen, M. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3609333 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“[231] propose a model to capture frequent motion and background patterns of activities in video data, treating patterns that deviate from learned frequent patterns as anomalies.”
BackgroundSelf-citationAn explainable and efficient deep learning framework for video anomaly detection
Wu, C., Shao, S., Tunc, C., Satam, P., & Hariri, S. (2022) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-021-03439-5 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Real-time secure health surveillance for smarter health communities
Alabdulatif, A., Khalil, I., Forkan, A. R. M., & Atiquzzaman, M. (2019) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2017.1700547 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhu, Y., Nayak, N. M., & Roy-Chowdhury, A. K.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- ORCID
- Zhu, Yingying
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-101
- ISSN
- 1932-4553 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0484
- OpenAlex
- W2058415349
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 14.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- activity recognition, video anomaly detection, context-aware modeling, convex optimization, wide-area surveillance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review