Cited by 121Human Pose and Action RecognitionContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications

Context-Aware Activity Recognition and Anomaly Detection in Video

Zhu, Yingying, Nayak, Nandita M., Roy-Chowdhury, Amit K.·2013·IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a mathematical framework to jointly model related activities with both motion and context information for activity recognition and anomaly detection. This is motivated from observations that activities related in space and time rarely occur independently and can serve as context for each other. The spatial and temporal distribution of different activities provides useful cues for the understanding of these activities. We denote the activities occurring with high frequencies in the database as normal activities. Given training data which contains labeled normal activities, our model aims to automatically capture frequent motion and context patterns for each activity class, as well as each pair of classes, from sets of predefined patterns during the learning process. Then, the learned model is used to generate globally optimum labels for activities in the testing videos. We show how to learn the model parameters via an unconstrained convex optimization problem and how to predict the correct labels for a testing instance consisting of multiple activities. The learned model and generated labels are used to detect anomalies whose motion and context patterns deviate from the learned patterns. We show promising results on the VIRAT Ground Dataset that demonstrates the benefit of joint modeling and recognition of activities in a wide-area scene and the effectiveness of the proposed method in anomaly detection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jstsp.2012.2234722

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most subspace anomaly detection methods were originally designed to tackle the curse of dimensionality when detecting anomalies in high-dimensional data.

    “Moreover, most subspace anomaly detection methods were originally designed to tackle the issue of curse of dimensionality when detecting anomalies in high-dimensional data [231].”

    From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [231]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, Y., Nayak, N. M., & Roy-Chowdhury, A. K.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
Published
2013-02
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
91-101
ISSN
  • 1932-4553 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0484
OpenAlex
W2058415349
Cited by
121
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6
FWCI
14.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Keywords
activity recognition, video anomaly detection, context-aware modeling, convex optimization, wide-area surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review