Cited by 66Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionCloud Data Security Solutions

Managing Your Private and Public Data: Bringing Down Inference Attacks Against Your Privacy

Open access
Salamatian, Salman, Zhang, Amy, du Pin Calmon, Flavio, Bhamidipati, Sandilya, Fawaz, Nadia, Kveton, Branislav, Oliveira, Pedro, Taft, Nina·2015·IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing

Abstract

We propose a practical methodology to protect a user's private data, when he wishes to publicly release data that is correlated with his private data, to get some utility. Our approach relies on a general statistical inference framework that captures the privacy threat under inference attacks, given utility constraints. Under this framework, data is distorted before it is released, according to a probabilistic privacy mapping. This mapping is obtained by solving a convex optimization problem, which minimizes information leakage under a distortion constraint. We address practical challenges encountered when applying this theoretical framework to real world data. On one hand, the design of optimal privacy mappings requires knowledge of the prior distribution linking private data and data to be released, which is often unavailable in practice. On the other hand, the optimization may become untractable when data assumes values in large size alphabets, or is high dimensional. Our work makes three major contributions. First, we provide bounds on the impact of a mismatched prior on the privacy-utility tradeoff. Second, we show how to reduce the optimization size by introducing a quantization step, and how to generate privacy mappings under quantization. Third, we evaluate our method on two datasets, including a new dataset that we collected, showing correlations between political convictions and TV viewing habits. We demonstrate that good privacy properties can be achieved with limited distortion so as not to undermine the original purpose of the publicly released data, e.g., recommendations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jstsp.2015.2442227

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to users' lack of awareness of their privacy and the connection between public and private data, AIA can be executed in the system.

    “Due to users' lack of awareness of their privacy and the connection between public and private data, AIA can be executed in the system [88, 100].”
  • Obfuscation can be achieved by solving a multi-objective optimization problem where the objectives are improving RS accuracy and protecting users' privacy, or applying probabilistic privacy mapping between private and to-be-released public data, or removing the most indicative items of the sensitive data with the addition of some fictitious data to confuse the adversary.

    “The obfuscation can be achieved by solving the multi-objective optimization problem where the objectives are improving RS accuracy & protecting users' privacy [119] or applying probabilistic privacy mapping between private & to be released public data [100] or removing the most indicative items of the sensitive data with the addition of some fictitious data to confuse the adversary [10, 11”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salamatian, S., Zhang, A., du Pin Calmon, F., Bhamidipati, S., Fawaz, N., Kveton, B., Oliveira, P., & Taft, N.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Technicolor (United States) (US)
  • Adobe Systems (United States) (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
Published
2015-10
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
1240-1255
ISSN
  • 1932-4553 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0484
OpenAlex
W1714669175
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
inference attacks, privacy-utility trade-off, information leakage, convex optimization, quantization, privacy-preserving data publishing, distortion constraint, political conviction, recommender systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review