The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive Radar Framework for Target Detection and Tracking
Open accessAbstract
Most radar systems employ a feed-forward processing chain in which they first perform some low-level processing of received sensor data to obtain target detections and then pass the processed data on to some higher-level processor such as a tracker, which extracts information to achieve a system objective. System performance can be improved using adaptation between the information extracted from the sensor/processor and the design and transmission of subsequent illuminating waveforms. As such, cognitive radar systems offer much promise. In this paper, we develop a general cognitive radar framework for a radar system engaged in target tracking. The model includes the higher-level tracking processor and specifies the feedback mechanism and optimization criterion used to obtain the next set of sensor data. Both target detection (track initiation/termination) and tracking (state estimation) are addressed. By separating the general principles from the specific application and implementation details, our formulation provides a flexible framework applicable to the general tracking problem. We demonstrate how the general framework may be specialized for a particular problem using a distributed sensor model in which system resources (observation time on each sensor) are allocated to optimize tracking performance. The cognitive radar system is shown to offer significant performance gains over a standard feed-forward system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation: Theory, Algorithms and Software
Bar‐Shalom, Y., Li, X. ‐., & Kirubarajan, T. (2002) · doi:10.1002/0471221279 · Cited by 6,782
Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory
Trees, H. L. V. (1968) · Cited by 5,969
Optimum Array Processing: Part IV of Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory
Van Trees, H. L. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471221104 · Cited by 5,188
Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I
Van Trees, H. L. (2001) · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471221082 · Cited by 3,891
Beyond the Kalman filter particle filters for tracking applications
Ristić, B., Arulampalam, S., & Gordon, N. (2004) · Cited by 3,372
Posterior Cramer-Rao bounds for discrete-time nonlinear filtering
Tichavsky, P., Muravchik, C. H., & Nehorai, A. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.668800 · Cited by 1,435
Cognitive radar: a way of the future
Haykin, S. (2006) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2006.1593335 · Cited by 1,229
Cognitive radar: A knowledge-aided fully adaptive approach
Guerci, J. R. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Radar Conference · doi:10.1109/radar.2010.5494403 · Cited by 472
Bayesian Bounds for Parameter Estimation and Nonlinear Filtering/Tracking
Dosso, S. (2008) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2897043 · Cited by 324
Cognitive Dynamic Systems: Perception-action Cycle, Radar and Radio
Haykin, S. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818363 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell, K. L., Baker, C. J., Smith, G. E., Johnson, J. T., & Rangaswamy, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1427-1439
- ISSN
- 1932-4553 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0484
- OpenAlex
- W2195832715
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 26.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive Radar Framework for Target Detection and Tracking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jstsp.2015.2465304
- The paper
- Bell, K. L., Baker, C. J., Smith, G. E., Johnson, J. T., & Rangaswamy, M. (2015). Cognitive Radar Framework for Target Detection and Tracking. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstsp.2015.2465304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.