Cited by 63Advanced SAR Imaging TechniquesImage and Signal Denoising MethodsMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis

Deep Learning for Passive Synthetic Aperture Radar

Open access
Yonel, Bariscan, Mason, Eric, Yazici, Birsen·2018·IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing

Abstract

We introduce a deep learning (DL) framework for inverse problems in imaging, and demonstrate the advantages and applicability of this approach in passive synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image reconstruction. We interpret image reconstruction as a machine learning task and utilize deep networks as forward and inverse solvers for imaging. Specifically, we design a recurrent neural network (RNN) architecture as an inverse solver based on the iterations of proximal gradient descent optimization methods. We further adapt the RNN architecture to image reconstruction problems by transforming the network into a recurrent auto-encoder, thereby allowing for unsupervised training. Our DL based inverse solver is particularly suitable for a class of image formation problems in which the forward model is only partially known. The ability to learn forward models and hyper parameters combined with unsupervised training approach establish our recurrent auto-encoder suitable for real world applications. We demonstrate the performance of our method in passive SAR image reconstruction. In this regime a source of opportunity, with unknown location and transmitted waveform, is used to illuminate a scene of interest. We investigate recurrent auto-encoder architecture based on the ℓ1and ℓ0constrained least-squares problem. We present a projected stochastic gradient descent based training scheme which incorporates constraints of the unknown model parameters. We demonstrate through extensive numerical simulations that our DL based approach out performs conventional sparse coding methods in terms of computation and reconstructed image quality, specifically, when no information about the transmitter is available.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jstsp.2017.2784181

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep learning is nowadays frequently utilised in SAR data applications by leading companies like Orbital Insight and Descartes Labs specializing in satellite earth observation analytics.

    “DL is nowadays being frequently utilised in SAR data applications by leading companies like Orbital Insight and Descartes Labs specializing in satellite earth observation analytics [156].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yonel, B., Mason, E., & Yazici, B.
Affiliations
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
Published
2018-02
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
90-103
ISSN
  • 1932-4553 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0484
OpenAlex
W2748912188
Cited by
63
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-16-1-0234)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Keywords
passive synthetic aperture radar, SAR image reconstruction, imaging inverse problems, recurrent neural networks, recurrent autoencoder, unsupervised learning, proximal gradient descent

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review