The DOI matches its Crossref record.
GTES: An Optimized Game-Theoretic Demand-Side Management Scheme for Smart Grid
Open accessAbstract
Demand-side management in smart grids has emerged as a hot topic for optimizing energy consumption. In conventional research works, energy consumption is optimized from the perspective of either the users or the power company. In this paper, we investigate how energy consumption may be optimized by taking into consideration the interaction between both parties. We propose a new energy price model as a function of total energy consumption. Also, we propose a new objective function, which optimizes the difference between the value and cost of energy. The power supplier pulls consumers in a round-robin fashion and provides them with energy price parameter and current consumption summary vector. Each user then optimizes his own schedule and reports it to the supplier, which, in turn, updates its energy price parameter before pulling the next consumers. This interaction between the power company and its consumers is modeled through a two-step centralized game, based on which we propose our game-theoretic energy schedule (GTES) method. The objective of our GTES method is to reduce the peak-to-average power ratio by optimizing the users' energy schedules. The performance of the GTES approach is evaluated through computer-based simulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Fog Computing Paradigm: Scenarios and Security Issues
Stojmenovic, I., & Wen, S. (2014) · Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.15439/2014f503 · Cited by 1,037
Multiclass Energy Management for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Driven by Prosumer Preferences
Morstyn, T., & McCulloch, M. D. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2018.2834472 · Cited by 533
Review and prospect of integrated demand response in the multi-energy system
Wang, J., Zhong, H., Ma, Z., Xia, Q., & Kang, C. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.150 · Cited by 521
An overview of Fog computing and its security issues
Stojmenovic, I., Wen, S., Huang, X., & Luan, H. (2016) · Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/cpe.3485 · Cited by 408
Self-citationBlockchain for Internet of Energy management: Review, solutions, and challenges
Miglani, A., Kumar, N., Chamola, V., & Zeadally, S. (2020) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2020.01.014 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Fadlullah, Z. M., Quan, D. M., Kato, N., & Stojmenovic, I.
- Venue
- IEEE Systems Journal
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 588-597
- ISSN
- 1932-8184 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-9234
- 2373-7816
- OpenAlex
- W2057810741
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GTES: An Optimized Game-Theoretic Demand-Side Management Scheme for Smart Grid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jsyst.2013.2260934
- The paper
- Fadlullah, Z. M., Quan, D. M., Kato, N., & Stojmenovic, I. (2014). GTES: An Optimized Game-Theoretic Demand-Side Management Scheme for Smart Grid. IEEE Systems Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsyst.2013.2260934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.