Cited by 14Advanced Memory and Neural ComputingIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingNeural Networks and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spiking Neural Networks—Part III: Neuromorphic Communications

Open access
Skatchkovsky, Nicolas, Jang, Hyeryung, Simeone, Osvaldo·2021·IEEE Communications Letters

Abstract

Synergies between wireless communications and artificial intelligence are increasingly motivating research at the intersection of the two fields. On the one hand, the presence of more and more wirelessly connected devices, each with its own data, is driving efforts to export advances in machine learning (ML) from high performance computing facilities, where information is stored and processed in a single location, to distributed, privacy-minded, processing at the end user. On the other hand, ML can address algorithm and model deficits in the optimization of communication protocols. However, implementing ML models for learning and inference on battery-powered devices that are connected via bandwidth-constrained channels remains challenging. This letter explores two ways in which Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) can help address these open problems. First, we discuss federated learning for the distributed training of SNNs, and then describe the integration of neuromorphic sensing, SNNs, and impulse radio technologies for low-power remote inference.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lcomm.2021.3050212

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inspired by dynamic spiking neurons in the human brain, the energy consumption and latency of edge AI can be significantly reduced by processing the learning tasks in an event-driven manner.

    “Inspired by the dynamic spiking neurons in the human brain, the energy consumption and latency of edge AI can be significantly reduced by processing the learning tasks in an event-driven manner [62], [63].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. skatchkovsky, 2020, Spiking neural networks—Part II: Detecting spatio-temporal patterns, arXiv 2010 14217
  2. cassidy, 2008, Impulse radio address event interconnects for body area networks and neural prostheses, Proc Argentine School Micro-Nanoelectron Technol Appl, 87
  3. shahshahani, 2015, An all-digital spike-based ultra-low-power IR-UWB dynamic average threshold crossing scheme for muscle force wireless transmission, Proc Design Autom Test Eur Conf Exhib, 1479
  4. 10.1109/JIOT.2015.2472291 · DOI
  5. yu, 2015, Towards ultrahigh speed impulse radio THz wireless communications, Proc Int Conf Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), 1
  6. 10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053861 · DOI
  7. skatchkovsky, 2020, End-to-end learning of neuromorphic wireless systems for low-power edge artificial intelligence, arXiv 2009 01527
  8. 10.3389/fnins.2015.00481 · DOI
  9. lichtsteiner, 2006, A $128\times128\,\,120$ db 30 mw asynchronous vision sensor that responds to relative intensity change, IEEE Int Solid-State Circuits Conf (ISSCC) Dig Tech Papers, 2060
  10. choi, 2019, Neural joint source-channel coding, Proc Int Conf Mach Learn, 1182
  11. 10.1561/2000000102 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/TCCN.2019.2919300 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/TCCN.2020.2985371 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/JSAC.2019.2904348 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.18653/v1/P19-1355 · DOI · Paper page
  16. jang, 2020, Spiking neural networks—Part I: Detecting spatial patterns, arXiv 2010 14208
  17. 10.1109/MSP.2019.2935234 · DOI · Paper page
  18. van den oord, 2017, Neural discrete representation learning, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 6306
  19. 10.1109/ISCAS45731.2020.9180812 · DOI
  20. moraitis, 2020, Short-term synaptic plasticity optimally models continuous environments, arXiv 2009 06808
  21. 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.09.005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Skatchkovsky, N., Jang, H., & Simeone, O.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
IEEE Communications Letters
Published
2021-06
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
1746-1750
ISSN
  • 1089-7798 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2558
  • 2373-7891
OpenAlex
W3096058467
Cited by
14
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Communications Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (725731)
  • King’s College London
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
spiking neural networks, federated learning, neuromorphic sensing, impulse radio, edge computing, distributed learning, battery-powered devices, communication protocol optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review