Cited by 159Calibration and Measurement TechniquesMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsThermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies

Estimating the Optimal Broadband Emissivity Spectral Range for Calculating Surface Longwave Net Radiation

Jie Cheng, Shunlin Liang, Yunjun Yao, Xiaotong Zhang·2013·IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters

Abstract

Surface broadband emissivity (BBE) in the thermal infrared spectrum is essential for calculating the surface total longwave net radiation in land surface models. However, almost all narrowband emissivities estimated from satellite observations are in the 3-14-μm spectral region. Previous studies converted these narrowband emissivities to BBE over different spectral ranges, such as 3-14, 8-12, 8-13.5, and 8-14 μm . Errors in the calculated total longwave net radiation must be quantified systematically using these BBEs. Moreover, the best spectral range for longwave net radiation must be determined. The key to addressing these issues is the use of the realistic emissivity spectra. By applying modern radiative transfer tools, we derived the emissivity spectra of water, snow, and minerals at 1-200 μm . Using these emissivity spectra, we first investigated the accuracy of replacing all-wavelength surface longwave net radiation with the surface longwave net radiation in the 3-100-, 4-100-, 2.5-100-, 2.5-200-, and 1-200-μm spectral domains. Surface longwave net radiation at 2.5-200 μm was found to be optimal, with a bias and root mean square (rms) of less than 0.928 and 0.993 W/m2, respectively. We calculated the errors when estimating surface longwave net radiation at 2.5-200 μm with BBE in different spectral ranges. The results show that BBE at 8-13.5 μm had the lowest error and the corresponding bias and rms were less than 0.002 and 1.453 W/m2, respectively. When the 2.5-200-μm s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lgrs.2012.2206367

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surface broadband emissivity (εbb) is related to narrowband thermal emissivities, which in turn are linked to NDVI or ρ.

    “𝜀𝑏𝑏 is related to narrowband thermal emissivities (Cheng et al., 2013; Tang et al., 2011), which in turn are linked to the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) or 𝜌 (Cheng et al., 2018; S. Xu et al., 2024)”

    From PGDM: Physically guided diffusion model for land surface temperature downscaling (2025) · cites this paper as Cheng et al., 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, J., Liang, S., Yao, Y., & Zhang, X.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
Published
2013-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
401-405
ISSN
  • 1545-598X (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0571
OpenAlex
W2003133188
Cited by
159
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Calibration and Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies
Keywords
broadband emissivity, surface longwave net radiation, land surface energy balance, snow emissivity, radiative transfer modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review