Cited by 57Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Classification of Remote Sensing Images With Parameterized Quantum Gates

Otgonbaatar, Soronzonbold, Datcu, Mihai·2022·IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters

Abstract

This letter studies how to program and assess a parameterized quantum circuit (PQC) for classifying Earth observation (EO) satellite images. In this exploratory study, we assess a PQC for classifying a two-label EO image dataset and compare it with a classic deep learning classifier. We use the PQC with an input space of only 17 quantum bits (qubits) due to the current limitations of quantum technology. As a real-world image for EO, we selected the Eurosat dataset obtained from multispectral Sentinel-2 images as a training dataset and a Sentinel-2 image of Berlin, Germany, as a test image. However, the high dimensionality of our images is incompatible with the PQC input domain of 17 qubits. Hence, we had to reduce the dimensionality of the input images for this two-label case to a vector with 16 elements; the 17th qubit remains reserved for storing label information. We employed a very deep convolutional network with an autoencoder as a technique for the dimensionality reduction of the input image, and we mapped the dimensionally reduced image onto 16 qubits by means of parameter thresholding. Then, we used a PQC to classify the two-label content of the dimensionally reduced Eurosat image dataset. A PQC classifies the Eurosat images with high accuracy as a classic deep learning method (and with even better accuracy in some instances). From our experiment, we derived and enhanced deeper insight into programming future gate-based quantum computers for many practical problems in EO.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lgrs.2021.3108014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The hybrid solutions are the preferred ones in the current stage of QML, mostly due to technology bottlenecks and limitations.

    “Moreover, it is worth highlighting that the hybrid solutions are the preferred ones in the current stage of QML, mostly due to technology bottlenecks and limitations [26], [27].”
  • Otgonbaatar and Datcu [27] proposed a binary classifier based on a very deep convolutional network and a 17-qubit quantum circuit.

    “Finally, Otgonbaatar and Datcu [27] proposed a binary classifier based on a very deep convolutional network and a 17-qubit quantum circuit.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 57

Authors
Otgonbaatar, S., & Datcu, M.
Affiliations
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Venue
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
Published
2022
Volume
19
Pages
1-5
ISSN
  • 1545-598X (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0571
OpenAlex
W3201454638
Cited by
57
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
variational quantum circuits, quantum machine learning, satellite image classification, Earth observation imagery, EuroSAT dataset, Sentinel-2, dimensionality reduction, autoencoder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review