The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Separation logic: a logic for shared mutable data structures
Abstract
In joint work with Peter O'Hearn and others, based on early ideas of Burstall, we have developed an extension of Hoare logic that permits reasoning about low-level imperative programs that use shared mutable data structure. The simple imperative programming language is extended with commands (not expressions) for accessing and modifying shared structures, and for explicit allocation and deallocation of storage. Assertions are extended by introducing a "separating conjunction" that asserts that its subformulas hold for disjoint parts of the heap, and a closely related "separating implication". Coupled with the inductive definition of predicates on abstract data structures, this extension permits the concise and flexible description of structures with controlled sharing. In this paper, we survey the current development of this program logic, including extensions that permit unrestricted address arithmetic, dynamically allocated arrays, and recursive procedures. We also discuss promising future directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dafny: An Automatic Program Verifier for Functional Correctness
Leino, K. R. M. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17511-4_20 · Cited by 940
A survey of symbolic execution techniques
Baldoni, R., Coppa, E., D’elia, D. C., Demetrescu, C., & Finocchi, I. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3182657 · Cited by 708
A type and effect system for deterministic parallel Java
Bocchino, R. L., Adve, V. S., Dig, D., Adve, S. V., Heumann, S., Komuravelli, R., Overbey, J., Simmons, P., Sung, H., & Vakilian, M. (2009) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object oriented programming systems languages and applications · doi:10.1145/1640089.1640097 · Cited by 265
Using Crash Hoare logic for certifying the FSCQ file system
Chen, H., Ziegler, D., Chajed, T., Chlipala, A., Kaashoek, M. F., & Zeldovich, N. (2015) · Proceedings of the 25th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles · doi:10.1145/2815400.2815402 · Cited by 211
Enhancing Automated Loop Invariant Generation for Complex Programs with Large Language Models
Liu, R., Chen, M., Wu, L.-I., Ke, J., & Li, G. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.10483 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Reynolds, J. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings 17th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2003-06-25
- Pages
- 55-74
- ISSN
- 1043-6871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137628566
- Cited by
- 2,156
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 55.97
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separation logic: a logic for shared mutable data structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/lics.2002.1029817
- The paper
- Reynolds, J. C. (2003). Separation logic: a logic for shared mutable data structures. Proceedings 17th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1109/lics.2002.1029817
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.