Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

weedNet: Dense Semantic Weed Classification Using Multispectral Images and MAV for Smart Farming

Sa, Inkyu, Chen, Zetao, Popovic, Marija, Khanna, Raghav, Liebisch, Frank, Nieto, Juan, Siegwart, Roland·2018·IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Abstract

Selective weed treatment is a critical step in autonomous crop management as related to crop health and yield. However, a key challenge is reliable and accurate weed detection to minimize damage to surrounding plants. In this letter, we present an approach for dense semantic weed classification with multispectral images collected by a micro aerial vehicle (MAV). We use the recently developed encoder-decoder cascaded convolutional neural network, SegNet, that infers dense semantic classes while allowing any number of input image channels and class balancing with our sugar beet and weed datasets. To obtain training datasets, we established an experimental field with varying herbicide levels resulting in field plots containing only either crop or weed, enabling us to use the normalized difference vegetation index as a distinguishable feature for automatic ground truth generation. We train six models with different numbers of input channels and condition (fine tune) it to achieve ~0.8 F1-score and 0.78 area under the curve classification metrics. For the model deployment, an embedded Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) system (Jetson TX2) is tested for MAV integration. Dataset used in this letter is released to support the community and future work.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lra.2017.2774979

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. liebisch, 2017, Automatic UAV-based field inspection campaigns for weeding in row crops, Proc 6th EARSeL SIG Imaging Spectrosc Workshop
  2. 10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989768 · DOI
  3. popovic, 2017, Multiresolution mapping and informative path planning for UAV-based terrain monitoring, Proc IEEE/RSJ Int Conf Intell Robots Syst
  4. 10.1016/j.compag.2013.05.004 · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2013.05.004
  5. 10.1109/LRA.2017.2651952 · doi:10.1109/lra.2017.2651952
  6. 10.1002/rob.21508 · doi:10.1002/rob.21508

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Sa, I., Chen, Z., Popovic, M., Khanna, R., Liebisch, F., Nieto, J., & Siegwart, R.
Venue
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2018-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
588-595
ISSN
  • 2377-3766 (ISSN-L)
  • 2377-3774
OpenAlex
W2755766995
Cited by
369
References
36
FWCI
23.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (644227, 644128)
  • Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (15.0029, 15.0044)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: weedNet: Dense Semantic Weed Classification Using Multispectral Images and MAV for Smart Farming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/lra.2017.2774979
The paper
Sa, I., Chen, Z., Popovic, M., Khanna, R., Liebisch, F., Nieto, J., & Siegwart, R. (2018). weedNet: Dense Semantic Weed Classification Using Multispectral Images and MAV for Smart Farming. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2017.2774979

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.