Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 539

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aerial Manipulation: A Literature Review

Ruggiero, Fabio, Lippiello, Vincenzo, Ollero, Anibal·2018·IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Abstract

Aerial manipulation aims at combining the versatility and the agility of some aerial platforms with the manipulation capabilities of robotic arms. This letter tries to collect the results reached by the research community so far within the field of aerial manipulation, especially from the technological and control point of view. A brief literature review of general aerial robotics and space manipulation is carried out as well.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lra.2018.2808541

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 539

Metadata

Authors
Ruggiero, F., Lippiello, V., & Ollero, A.
Venue
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2018-07
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
1957-1964
ISSN
  • 2377-3766 (ISSN-L)
  • 2377-3774
OpenAlex
W2792083172
Cited by
539
References
1
FWCI
31.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aerial Manipulation: A Literature Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/lra.2018.2808541
The paper
Ruggiero, F., Lippiello, V., & Ollero, A. (2018). Aerial Manipulation: A Literature Review. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2018.2808541

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.