Cited by 372Image and Video Quality AssessmentImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesDigital Media Forensic Detection

A DCT Statistics-Based Blind Image Quality Index

Open access
Saad, Michele A, Bovik, Alan C, Charrier, Christophe·2010·IEEE Signal Processing Letters

Abstract

Abstract—The development of general-purpose no-reference approaches to image quality assessment still lags recent advances in full-reference methods. Additionally, most no-reference or blind approaches are distortion-specific, meaning they assess only a specific type of distortion assumed present in the test image (such as blockiness, blur, or ringing). This limits their application domain. Other approaches rely on training a machine learning algorithm. These methods however, are only as effective as the features used to train their learning machines. Towards ameliorating this we introduce the BLIINDS index (BLind Image Integrity Notator using DCT Statistics) which is a no-reference approach to image quality assessment that does not assume a specific type of distortion of the image. It is based on predicting image quality based on observing the statistics of local discrete cosine transform coefficients, and it requires only minimal training. The method is shown to correlate highly with human perception of quality. Index Terms—Anisotropy, discrete cosine transform, kurtosis, natural scene statistics, no-reference quality assessment. I.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lsp.2010.2045550

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 372

Authors
Saad, M. A., Bovik, A. C., & Charrier, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Université de Caen Normandie (FR)
Venue
IEEE Signal Processing Letters
Published
2010-06
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
583-586
ISSN
  • 1070-9908 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2361
OpenAlex
W2124562516
Cited by
372
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
FWCI
26.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Signal Processing Letters (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
no-reference image quality assessment, discrete cosine transform coefficients, kurtosis, natural scene statistics, anisotropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review